Original source · versioned page text
RFI traffic updated 2016
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0111 Information Request Response to Concurrence Agency - 2-4 Lamonts Rd & 19 Trading post Rd, Cooroy - email 1 of 2.
Response column key:
Achieved
19.2 Transport infrastructure and network design state code P/S Performance solution
N/A Not applicable
Table 19.2.1: All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
All state transport infrastructure – except state-controlled roads
PO1 Development does not compromise No acceptable outcome is prescribed. There is no impact to the state transport infrastructure or
the safe and efficient management or transport networks. Please refer to the Traffic Impact
operation of state transport infrastructure Assessment.
or transport networks.
Editor’s note: To demonstrate compliance with
this performance outcome, it is recommended
that a traffic impact assessment be prepared.
A traffic impact assessment should identify
any upgrade works required to mitigate
impacts on the safety and operational integrity
of the state transport corridor.
PO2 Development does not compromise AO2.1 The layout and design of the proposed The proposed development does not impact on the delivery
planned upgrades to state transport development accommodates planned upgrades to state of state transport infrastructure.
infrastructure or the development of transport infrastructure.
future state transport infrastructure in AND
future state transport corridors.
Editor’s note: Written advice from DTMR AO2.2 The layout and design of the development The proposed development does not impact on the delivery
advising that there are no planned upgrades of
accommodates the delivery of state transport of state transport infrastructure or future state transport
state transport infrastructure or future state
transport corridors that will be compromised infrastructure in future state transport corridors. corridors.
by the development will assist in addressing Editor’s note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable
this performance outcome. outcome, it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be
prepared.
PO3 Development does not adversely AO3.1 Development does not require a new railway
impact on the safety of a railway crossing.
crossing. OR
AO3.2 A new railway crossing is grade separated. N/A
OR
AO3.3 Impacts to level crossing safety are mitigated. N/A
Editor’s note: To demonstrate compliance with this acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a traffic impact assessment be
prepared. An impact on a level crossing may require an
Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model (ALCAM)
assessment to be undertaken. Section 2.2 – Railway crossing
State development assessment provisions Module 19 — State transport network functionality 19.2 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
23 November 2015 V1.7 Page 1 of 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.