Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2020-10-12 GC Agenda - Item 9 - Attachment 1 - Aircraft Noise Ombudsman Report - Investigation

of 34

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

9.8       There was never any realistic prospect that residents in the general area,
          despite the chance to provide their feedback, had any significant opportunity to
          influence the proposed flight paths. This quickly became apparent to them
          during the process and was the fundamental basis of the complaints to the
          ANO.

9.9       Airservices’ evaluation of the feedback, in separate reports for the general and
          target area, was that the consultation was “successful” based on the number
          of activities and volume of response. This in itself gave rise to further
          complaints. Complaints to Airservices about the consultation process were put
          to one side and eventually responded to well after the end of the consultation
          period.




Aircraft Noise Ombudsman
Investigation into complaints about the introduction of new flight paths in the Sunshine Coast (April 2020)   Page 29
Log in to download the original file

2020-10-12 GC Agenda - Item 9 - Attachment 1 - Aircraft Noise Ombudsman Report - Investigation(PDF, 689KB).pdf · 705 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.