Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

NSC 1 copy

Attached to the e-mail PM Submission- Dianne Crookes - MCU22/0067.

of 3

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                Dianne Crookes

                                                                7 Jilbar Close

                                                                Caravonica QLD 4878

09/06/2022

Noosa Shire Council

Planning and Development Assessment

9 Pelican Street

Tewantin Qld 4565

(07) 53296500



Dear Assessment Manager,

In relation to 401 Sunrise Road Tinbeerwah, Application Ref MCU22/0067 This is a
submission in response to the above proposal.

My sister Karen Perkins and I are the owners of 403 Sunrise Road Tinbeerwah. We
have read the proposed development application MCU22/0067. Our objections are
related to the direct impacts to the neighbourhood’s quality of life and to our residence
403 Sunrise Road Tinbeerwah.

Identified impacts include the following:

   •   Potential increase in motor vehicle accidents, due to additional persons
       accessing or leaving the driveway daily with no familiarity of the, at times difficult
       conditions. The driveway has a limited sight distance when entering or exiting
       Sunrise Road.
   •   Stormwater from any proposed development of the driveway being diverted onto
       our property.
   •   Excessive and ongoing deterioration of the driveway.
   •   Driveway approaching onto 403 Sunrise Road property boundaries.
   •   Increase risk of additional or excessive parking on the driveway from non-
       residents resulting in reduced access for the residents and services vehicles and
       a reduced available turn around area.
Log in to download the original file

NSC 1 copy.pdf · 67 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

   Noted concerns and inaccuracies to clauses included in the proposal Ref
   MCU22/0067

The proposal states that: “The property is accessed via an easement and runs past one
neighbour. It is acknowledged that the portion of the driveway near the neighbour is
unsealed and is proposed to be sealed prior to the commencement of the use.”

   •   Four neighbouring properties are accessed by the driveway, 393, 399, 401 & 403
       Sunrise Road. The driveway runs along both 393 and 403 Sunrise Road.
   •   This clause implies but does not state that the cost the driveway to be sealed will
       be incurred by the applicant or the owner, or future owner of the proposed
       business.
   •   This clause dose not state that the ongoing maintenance and the cost in
       maintaining the driveway will be incurred by the applicant or the owner or future
       owner of 401 Sunrise Road due to the proposed change of the material use of
       this property.
   •   This clause dos not clarify that any required upgrade to the driveway will be the
       responsibility of the applicant or the owner or future owner of 401 Sunrise Road
       for the duration to the proposed change of the material use of this property

We request consideration and outcome clarification to be provide for the
following:

   •   Number 403 Sunrise Road property boundaries will not be compromised.
   •   That before any proposed development of the driveway, a survey by a registered
       surveyor will be completed identifying the properties boundary of 403 Sunrise
       Road and the driveway easement boundary.
   •   That stormwater runoff from the driveway will not be diverted or discharge onto
       the property of Number 403 Sunrise Road.
   •   That owners of 403, 393, 399 Sunrise Road will not be disadvantaged or accrue
       cost related to the Application Ref MCU22/0067 or any associated upgrade or
       maintenance of the driveway.
   •   That all potential security risk or safety impacts are considered and addressed so
       there are no negative impacts to owners of 403, 393, 399 Sunrise Road

Page 3

   •   That the Development assessor of the application recognises that there are 3
       other properties that access this driveway easement that will be directly impacted
       by this application.
   •   That any conditional clauses placed on the Application Ref MCU22/0067 will be
       enforced for the duration of the proposed material change of the property.

With reference to the above please could you assist us by providing any additional
information that is relevant. Please also provide a response addressing our concerns.

Kind Regards




Dianne Crookes

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.