Original source · versioned page text
Reference Documents - MCU24 0141 & OPW24 0184 [As Published]
Very large file (16.7 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 9, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Table 4 - Bioretention Basin Characteristics
Characteristic Bio Basin
Extended Detention (m) 0.300
Filter Media Depth (m) 0.700
Transition Layer Depth (m) 0.100
Drainage Layer Depth (m) 0.200
Surface area (m2) 48.0
Filter Area (m2) 28.0
Table 5 - Swale Characteristics
Characteristic Swale 2
Length (m) 50
Bed Slope 0.5%
Base Width (m) 0
Top Width (m) 0.6
Depth (m) 0.15
4.2.4. MUSICX Model Results
MUSIC modelling of the proposed catchments was performed to ensure the nominated treatment strategy
achieves the required pollutant reduction objectives. The target reductions in stormwater pollutants are based
on a comparison of an unmitigated scenario, having no treatment on site, and the mitigated scenario, which
has stormwater treatment measures incorporated onto the site.
Table 6 provides the modelling results for the development in its entirety. The MUSIC modelling demonstrates
that compliance has been met or exceeded for the objectives required by NSC and the SPP (2017) for Total
Suspended Solids (TSS), Total Phosphorus (TP), Total Nitrogen (TN) and Gross Pollutants (GP).
Table 6 - MUSICX Model Results
Pollutant Unmitigated Mitigated Reduction Achieved Target Reduction Compliance
(kg/yr) (kg/yr) (%) (%)
TSS 584.2 99.9 82.9 80 Y
TP 1.26 0.370 70.64 60 Y
TN 9.244 4.762 48.48 45 Y
GP 88.72 0 100 90 Y
240127 – Stormwater Management Plan 8 of 10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.