Original source · versioned page text
10. APP E. Traffic Impact Assessment Report
Attached to the e-mail MCU14/0102 Development application Part 2 of 4 App E Traffic Report, App F Landscape Plan.
Original PDF page 17, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
PEKOL TRAFFIC & TRANSPORT In terms of the restaurant / café use, we have adjusted the use area to account for the kitchen and food storage areas being excluded from this calculation (we have assumed these areas make up 25% of the total use area), with the proposed outdoor area (ie 47m’) added. The estimated use areas have been adopted for all other components of the development. Table 3.1 sets out the parking standards described above and the associated number of spaces to be provided under each. Table 3.1: PARKING REQUIREMENTS Service Station 100m? use area _—_4 spaces per service bay (min of 5 spaces) 1 space per 20m’ or part thereof, of use Shop 109m? use area 5.6 area for areas up to 100m? 137m? GFA Restaurant / Café 1 space per 10m?GFA of use area 14.2 (142m? use area) 1 space per 30m? up to 150m? GFA 594m? GFA Tyre & Mechanical 1 space per 50m? up to 500m? GFA 13.0 (582m? use area) . 1 space per 100m? in excess of 500m’ GFA Retail / Industrial 1,663m? GFA Various (see above) 23.0 — 32.0 Business (1599m? use area) Total 56 - 65 spaces 3.3.2 Provision It is proposed to provide a total of 59 car parking spaces and five motorcycle spaces for the development (ie a total of 64 parking spaces). Of the total provision, 13 car parking spaces would be located adjacent to the service station and restaurant / café component of the development, including one Person with Disability (PWD) space. A total of 10 car parking spaces are to be provided for the vehicle repair workshop with 36 car parking spaces (including two PWD spaces) and five motorcycle spaces proposed for the remaining uses. The total proposed car parking provision is midway within the range of parking spaces required under the Noosa Plan. The Noosa Plan vehicle parking requirements is for standalone facilities and does not account for the efficiencies gained from the consolidation of shared car parking spaces in a mixed-use environment. Clearly there will be a number of linked trips between the various on-site uses, reducing total parking demand. It is also considered that the times of peak parking generation for each of the various uses will not coincide. For example, the tyre and mechanical use is likely to generate its peak car parking demand in the P:\2014-15\15-067 LIONEL DONOVAN DRIVE, NOOSAVILLE\REPORTS\139 EUMUNDI ROAD, NOOSAVILLE TIA REPORT.DOCX 13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.