Original source · versioned page text
LATE RFI - SCG 33114 (SWM) Rev A
Original PDF page 15, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
6.1.3 Peak Flow Comparison
Table 6.5 compares the peak flow rates for the existing and developed cases.
Table 6.5 – Comparison of Existing Vs Developed Peak Flows
AEP Q1 Q2 Q5 Q10 Q20 Q50 Q100
Storm (1EY) (0.5EY) (0.2EY) (10%AEP) (5%AEP) (2%AEP) (1%AEP)
Existing 24 33 45 56 69 83 95
(L/s)
Developed 40 50 62 69 83 102 118
(L/s)
Increase 16 17 17 13 14 19 23
(L/s)
As shown in Table 6.5 Stormwater peak discharge will increase as a result of the proposed development
due to the increase in impervious area. Therefore, it is proposed to utilise an OSD system to mitigate the
peak stormwater discharge rates from the proposed development prior to discharging to the lawful point
of discharge as discussed in section 4.2.
6.1.3 Peak Flow Mitigation (OSD)
To mitigate the peak flow increase from the developed site, it is proposed to include an inground
detention tank for all roof water runoff from units 3-10, located under the proposed driveway. The
detention tank is to be fitted with a low flow and high flow orifice plate to detain a portion of the runoff
from the site and limit the peak flow rates of pre-development levels for all storms up to the Q100 storm
event. The proposed on-site detention tank will have the following properties: -
- Roof Catchment = 705 m2 (100% Impervious)
-
Base Area = 36 m2
-
Internal Depth = 1 m
-
Low Flow Orifice = 70 mm diameter
- High Flow Orifice = 95 mm diameter
-
Overflow Pit Elevation from base = 0.5 m
-
Required Volume = 31 m3
-
Provided Volume = 36 m3
Figure 6.1 illustrates the DRAINS Model layout for the detention tank.
SCG Consulting Engineers Page 13 SCG Ref: 33114(SWMP)
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.