Original source · versioned page text
LATE RFI - SCG 33114 (SWM) Rev A
Original PDF page 16, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Figure 6.1 – Drains Model Layout
Peak flow rates determined for each 3 cases are outlined in Table 6.6.
Table 6.6 – Comparison of Peak Flows
AEP Q1 Q2 Q5 Q10 Q20 Q50 Q100
Storm (1EY) (0.5EY) (0.2EY) (10%AEP) (5%AEP) (2%AEP) (1%AEP)
Existing 24 33 45 56 69 83 95
(L/s)
Developed 40 50 62 69 83 102 118
(L/s)
Mitigated 24 (0) 31 (-2) 45 (0) 56 (0) 69 (0) 79 (-4) 91 (-4)
(L/s)
As shown in Table 6.6 the proposed detention tank has demonstrated the proposed mitigated peak
discharge flow rates will not exceed the total pre-development flows for all design storms, up to and
including the 1% AEP Design Storm. Refer Appendix D for the drains results.
The proposed stormwater detention system is therefore considered to be adequate for the development.
SCG Consulting Engineers Page 14 SCG Ref: 33114(SWMP)
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.