Original source · versioned page text
Appendix F. Civil Engineering Report Part 2
Attached to the e-mail Retail Bus Type 5 & Type 2 & Op Works -Civil Eng Report Pt 2 MCU17/0572 & OPW17/0611.
The original of this document is very large (11.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 13, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Noosa Shire Council – The Noosa Plan
Driveways and Carparking Code
Performance Criteria and Acceptable Solutions
PERFORMANCE OUTCOMES ACCEPTABLE OUTCOMES COMMENTS
for other uses—grease and oil arrestors or stormwater
quality improvement devices are incorporated into the
design to treat run-off prior to run-off exiting from the
premises.
14.113 Carpark design and layout
O7 S7.1 Refer to architectural plans
Sufficient carparking is provided to accommodate the The number of parking and loading bays is not less than
number and type of vehicles likely to be generated by the the minimum number specified in Table 14-51 Vehicle prepared by Nettleton Tribe for
development having regard to the specifics of the use Parking Requirements; details.
including—
a) the type and intensity of land use;
b) any existing parking available on the site;
c) hours of operation;
d) likely numbers of users;
e) the peak parking demand periods of uses on the
site; and
the availability of alternative carparking.
O8 S8.1 Refer to architectural plans
The layout of the development provides adequate,
clearly defined and easily accessible— Buildings and structures are setback a minimum of 20m prepared by Nettleton Tribe for
a) on-site vehicle parking and manoeuvring from a water supply pipeline as shown on Overlay Map details.
areas; and OM3.5.
loading and manoeuvring areas for delivery and service
vehicles. S8.2 The number of loading bays is not less than the Refer to architectural plans
minimum number specified in Table 14-51. prepared by Nettleton Tribe for
details.
Solution: ✓ = Acceptable Solution
A/S = Alternative Solution
N/A = Not applicable to this proposal
Page 4 of 8
July 2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.