Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 Special Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA 16 DECEMBER 2019
The below table identifies the estimated project costs.
Item Cost (excl. GST)
Costs Year to Date (November 2019) $97,800
Tendered Contract Value $2,619,227
Consultants, superintendent and staff costs $170,000
Provision for relocation of services (Telstra) $210,000
Subtotal $3,097,027
Contingency $619,405
Total project cost $3,716,432
A budget submission will be provided for the $1,961,918 shortfall across BR3 (2020) and the 2021
capital works program to reflect the expected project cash flows as provided by the successful
tenderer.
8. Risks & Opportunities
RISKS MITIGATION
Finance
Council request for scope increases. This is to be mitigated through the Capital Works Project Control
Group and Capital Works Executive meetings and limitation of
client requested scope variations.
Scope changes once construction Council acceptance of scope as awarded with intention of not
commences and project becomes increasing scope.
publically visible.
Geotechnical conditions give rise for A preliminary Geotechnical investigation has been completed
contractor claiming variation costs. by Council and the report provided as part of the tender
documentation.
The contractor has confirmed they have allowed for
comprehensive geotechnical investigations during the design
phase.
There is a risk that soil conditions may not allow for the
proposed foundation method and the contractor will need to
revert to the specified pile solution. This risk sits with the
Contractor but the project team has considered it as part of its
contingency allowance.
Contractor claims for variations based This has been mitigated through the lump sum procurement
on changes required for design. method with further mitigation through post tender clarifications
tying the contractor firmly into the agreed scope of works.
Clashes with public utility providers give Prior tender phase, Council staff had extensive collaboration
rise for contractor claiming variation with utility providers UnityWater and Telstra to lock in the scope
costs. and work method. The contractor is aware of the requirements.
The contractor will coordinate activities around these
relocations. While Telstra will invoice Council directly for the
relocation works, UnityWater will pay for the renewal of the
water main attached to the bridge as the asset was already
identified as end of life.
Contingency amount being insufficient. This risk may be mitigated through the adoption of further value
engineering to occur during the design and construction phase
process as well through appointment of experienced contractor
and contract supervision of an internal experienced
Superintendent.
Page 21 of 25
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.