Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Spit SEMP Final Report 66
Shoreline Erosion Mitigation Options
Table 4-2 Rapid Assessment Criteria
Environmental Reversible /
Capital Recurrent Community Effectiveness Legal / Approval Technical
or Social Adaptable
Costs Costs Acceptability Over Time Risk Viability
Impact Future
Unlikely to be Is unlikely to be
Will require an EIS
acceptable to Option is technically viable
and/or Govt program to
Will impact community and irreversible once Option does not without
Very Very implement;
negatively on politically unpalatable; implemented; provide long term substantial
expensive expensive There is a residual risk
STOP environment, Extensive community Option limits solution; engineering (or
($500K to ($500K to community or that approval will not be other) design
education, alternatives Only effective over
millions) millions) beach amenity obtainable for the investigation and
endorsement by options in the short term
proposed works / capabilities for
Minister(s) and future
strategy implementation
Council required
Will require Govt
Option is only a
approvals to be
Would be palatable to short term solution, Is likely to be
implemented, or
some, not others Option is but has other technically viable
Moderately Moderately assistance through
(~50/50 response); reversible or benefits; or at the site, but
expensive expensive existing Govt program;
SLOW ($100,000 - ($50,000 -
No net impact Briefing to adaptable, but at Option requires would require
considerable Generally further
$500,000) $500,000) Councillors, GM and further resources /
cost / effort approvals/assistance investigations to
community education changes to be
would be granted clarify
required effective over long
assuming requirements
term
are met
Option can be
Will benefit easily adapted
environment, Is very politically for future
community or palatable, acceptable circumstances or
No or minimal Is technically
Limited cost Limited cost beach amenity to community; should impacts Option provides a
GO (<$100,000) (<$50,000) (e.g. improve not occur, option long term solution
government approvals viable at the site /
Minimal education required to implement location
beach access, would not
recreation, required negatively
habitats etc.) impact future
generations
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.