Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Spit SEMP Final Report 67
Shoreline Erosion Mitigation Options
Table 4-3 Rapid Assessment of Options Results
Community Acceptability
Planning & Consultation
Environmental or Social
Score (Go = 1, Slow = 0,
Effectiveness over time
Reversible / Adaptable
Legal / Approval Risk
Treats Erosion Issue
Maintains Foreshore
Technical Viability
Recommended
Inundation Issue
Maintains Beach
Recurrent Costs
Treats Oceanic
Option Option Type Asset Type &/or
Capital Cost
Other Comments
Stop = -1)
Amenity
Habitat
Impact
No Regrets / Preliminary Actions
Monitor beach condition, scarp
location and recession rates to
G G G G G G G G Beach and embankment
Monitoring determine when risk approaches ✓ o o o o o o o o 8 scarp location.
unacceptable levels and
management triggers are reached.
Recently completed as
Detailed Beach Undertake detailed hazard part of the current study
G G G G G G G G
Erosion Hazard assessment that identifies site ✓ o o o o o o o o 8 and should be reviewed
Studies specific setback erosion distances. and updated as new
data becomes available.
Joint funding may be
required to fund some
Investigate Joint Investigate a range of potential joint
protection options that
funding arrangements to treat G G G G G G G G
Funding coastal hazard risks (state ✓ o o o o o o o o 8 are prohibitively
Arrangements expensive for Council
government, private landholder etc.).
alone and/or directly
benefit freehold land.
Build acceptance and resilience for Suitable for residents
Community coastal risk management in the and wider community.
community by providing ongoing G G G G G G G G Could be delivered in
Education and information regarding coastal ✓ o o o o o o o o 8 conjunction with CHAP
Consultation hazards, risks, monitoring and communication
implementation of actions. activities.
Continue to implement and support Continue to manage and
Dune and Habitat G G G G G G G G
dune care/habitat management ✓ ✓ ✓ 8 encourage revegetation
Management programs
o o o o o o o o
of Noosa Spit.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.