Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Spit SEMP Final Report 68
Shoreline Erosion Mitigation Options
Community Acceptability
Planning & Consultation
Environmental or Social
Score (Go = 1, Slow = 0,
Effectiveness over time
Reversible / Adaptable
Legal / Approval Risk
Treats Erosion Issue
Maintains Foreshore
Technical Viability
Recommended
Inundation Issue
Maintains Beach
Recurrent Costs
Treats Oceanic
Option Option Type Asset Type &/or
Capital Cost
Other Comments
Stop = -1)
Amenity
Habitat
Impact
Remove unnecessary or informal
Beach Access access; formalise appropriate public G G G G G G G G
✓ ✓ 8 Whole of Noosa Spit.
Management paths; conduct inspection and o o o o o o o o
repairs to access after erosion.
Planned Retreat Options
Accept loss of land or assets
affected by a hazard event (i.e. once
S S S S S Unlikely to be suitable
affected, the assets or land is not
Accept Impacts G G l l t l l G considering the
replaced). Allows Dog Beach to ✓ 2
(Do Nothing) recede without intervention,
o o o o o o o o sheltering to existing
w w p w w development.
potentially leading to a
breakthrough.
Partial acquisition of freehold land to S S S S S Not likely to be viable
Partial Land accommodate coastal management t G G t l G t t considering the value of
✓ ✓ -1
Acquisition options and/or be designated as o o o o o o o o potentially vulnerable
public land. p p w p p freehold land.
Not currently viable. If
High risk private properties are
the option of retreat is to
bought at market prices, and then
S S S S S be considered broadly
rented out until hazard impacts are
Buy Back / Lease t G G t l G t t as part of the CHAP and
imminent (years). When hazard is ✓ ✓ -1
Back imminent, the property is
o o o o o o o o long term adaptation
p p w p p planning, this option
demolished and land returned to the
could be further
public.
investigated.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.