Original source · versioned page text
2019-12-16 GC Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Noosa Spit Shoreline Erosion Management Plan-Part 1
The original of this document is very large (18.5 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnNoosa Spit SEMP Final Report 69
Shoreline Erosion Mitigation Options
Community Acceptability
Planning & Consultation
Environmental or Social
Score (Go = 1, Slow = 0,
Effectiveness over time
Reversible / Adaptable
Legal / Approval Risk
Treats Erosion Issue
Maintains Foreshore
Technical Viability
Recommended
Inundation Issue
Maintains Beach
Recurrent Costs
Treats Oceanic
Option Option Type Asset Type &/or
Capital Cost
Other Comments
Stop = -1)
Amenity
Habitat
Impact
Protect - Regional Management Options
Stage 1 of the strategy was The Stage 1 training wall
Full implemented and included is performing as
construction of the training wall at
Implementation the western end of Dog Beach and S S S S S S S
intended however the
submerged structure
of Strategy submerged structure. t t l l l l l G
✓ 1/2 ✓ -1 has been damaged by
Proposed by o o o o o o o o
propeller strike and is
Stage 2 of the strategy involves a p p w w w w w
Sunshine Coast significant extension of the slumping. Scour is
Council submerged structure and addition of evident at both
two small groynes. structures.
The existing groyne
allows sand bypassing
and development of the
Extend existing structure to intercept southern spit (north of
Existing Groyne sand and reduce bypassing of the S S S S S S S Dog Beach) which
Extension at groyne into the river mouth. t t l l t t l G
1/2 -3 influences the entrance
Southern River o o o o o o o o channel alignment.
This option would potentially benefit p p w w p p w
Mouth operation of the sand shifter. Uncertainty whether a
reduced rate of
bypassing would benefit
Dog Beach.
The new structure is
intended to intercept
sand and reduce
S S S S S S S S development of the
New Groyne at New structure to intercept sand and northern spit which
t t l l t t t l
Northern side of reduce season transport into the 1/2
o o o o o o o o -5 influences the entrance
River Mouth river mouth from North Shore channel alignment.
p p w w p p p w
Uncertainty whether
these works would
benefit Dog Beach.
G:\Admin\B23636.g.mpb.NoosaSpit_SEMP\R.B23636.001.02.SEMP_final.docx
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.