Original source · versioned page text
Engineering Code Assessment Report
Original PDF page 5, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
2.3 SOILS A geotechnical report has not been carried out as yet for this site. This will be undertaken for the development approval for Building Work. From experience, however, the soil conditions on site will consist of fine to medium grain sand. 2.3.1 ACID SULPHATE SOILS Acid Sulphate soils are unlikely to be encountered on this site. 2.3.2 CONTAMINATED SOILS An assessment as to whether the subject site contains contaminated soil has been undertaken. A search of the Department of Environment and Resource Management’s Contaminated Land Register has been performed and no contamination is apparent. 2.4 EROSION SEDIMENT CONTROL Based on the completed Noosa Council Erosion Hazard Assessment Form, the proposal is classified as a “low risk” development for erosion potential see Appendix B for a copy of the completed form. Erosion and sediment control (ESC) measures will be required to be established and maintained in accordance with IECA’s standards of best practice. Preparation of a detailed ESC plan will be completed as part of the operational works submission. 2.5 FLOODING Flooding will not be a problem as minimum ground level is RL72 and it is not in an overland flow path. NMA_ECAR_19323 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.