Original source · versioned page text
Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU26 0040, OPW26 0066 & RAL26 0013 (As Published)
There is no directional signage or linemarking to direct traffic through the site. This creates
potential conflict points in Stage 1 and between stage boundaries (i.e., where Stages 1, 2
and 4 meet – and where Stages 1 and 4 meet) where who has ‘right of way’ is not clear. The
risk is manageable through conditioning plan amendments prior to the prestart meeting.
Engineering suggests that direction signage and linemarking could reasonably be
implemented to minimise any conflicts.
Refer to the below extract highlighting the areas of concern.
Figure 11 – Car Parking Manoeuvrability as shown in the submitted Civil Plans
Two loading bays for an articulated vehicle (AV) are provided in Stage 1 and 4. This is
considered appropriate. The extent of internal road is appropriate to facilitate their movement
in a safe manner.
The carparking layout does not include a pedestrian route to address the conflict between
pedestrians accessing various tenancies and vehicles circulating the site. Engineering
suggests that there are various strategies to address this risk, for example signage,
linemarking and other speed controls. A condition has been included.
Waste
A Waste Management Plan has been submitted which details the expected waste generation
for the development. The proposal includes multiple bin storage areas across the
development which provides adequate waste management as each stage is constructed and
tenanted. A Waste Collection Vehicle is able to safely manoeuvre the site and exit in a
forward gear.
Stormwater
A bioretention basin is proposed to be constructed as part of Stage 1. The basin has been
sized to provide treatment to the entire developed site to satisfy the load reduction targets in
the Water Quality and Drainage Code. A dedicated vehicle access ramp has not been
proposed, but the consulting engineer has stated that the proposed 1:3 batter is sufficient to
allow for ongoing maintenance. Since the bioretention basin is privately owned and
maintained, this is considered appropriate.
The basin includes extended detention to attenuate the increase in peak flows during all
events up to, and including, the 1% AEP event with a climate change allowance.
Earthworks
Page 11 of 33
Document Set ID: 25021329
Version: 9, Version Date: 12/08/2026
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.