Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU26 0040, OPW26 0066 & RAL26 0013 (As Published)

of 33
                      There is no directional signage or linemarking to direct traffic through the site. This creates
                      potential conflict points in Stage 1 and between stage boundaries (i.e., where Stages 1, 2
                      and 4 meet – and where Stages 1 and 4 meet) where who has ‘right of way’ is not clear. The
                      risk is manageable through conditioning plan amendments prior to the prestart meeting.
                      Engineering suggests that direction signage and linemarking could reasonably be
                      implemented to minimise any conflicts.
                      Refer to the below extract highlighting the areas of concern.




                                       Figure 11 – Car Parking Manoeuvrability as shown in the submitted Civil Plans



                      Two loading bays for an articulated vehicle (AV) are provided in Stage 1 and 4. This is
                      considered appropriate. The extent of internal road is appropriate to facilitate their movement
                      in a safe manner.
                      The carparking layout does not include a pedestrian route to address the conflict between
                      pedestrians accessing various tenancies and vehicles circulating the site. Engineering
                      suggests that there are various strategies to address this risk, for example signage,
                      linemarking and other speed controls. A condition has been included.
                      Waste
                      A Waste Management Plan has been submitted which details the expected waste generation
                      for the development. The proposal includes multiple bin storage areas across the
                      development which provides adequate waste management as each stage is constructed and
                      tenanted. A Waste Collection Vehicle is able to safely manoeuvre the site and exit in a
                      forward gear.
                      Stormwater
                      A bioretention basin is proposed to be constructed as part of Stage 1. The basin has been
                      sized to provide treatment to the entire developed site to satisfy the load reduction targets in
                      the Water Quality and Drainage Code. A dedicated vehicle access ramp has not been
                      proposed, but the consulting engineer has stated that the proposed 1:3 batter is sufficient to
                      allow for ongoing maintenance. Since the bioretention basin is privately owned and
                      maintained, this is considered appropriate.
                      The basin includes extended detention to attenuate the increase in peak flows during all
                      events up to, and including, the 1% AEP event with a climate change allowance.
                      Earthworks


                                                                                                                Page 11 of 33

Document Set ID: 25021329
Version: 9, Version Date: 12/08/2026

Log in to download the original (Delegated Report - Code - Planning MCU26 0040, OPW26 0066 & RAL26 0013 (As Published).pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.