Council archive · source document
001A333D.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
AR
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST gatag
mooring the
unit, to
concrete
anchors in
the bank
landward
of the
pontoon; or
(ii) moored
by piles; 6 ;
(c) if a relevant oat
planning so
scheme
standard is
more. stringent
@ than the
standard ty
mentioned — in WO ats
paragraph (a) et
or (b)}—the relevant we TY
planning scheme ‘a aed
standard, to the 4
extent it is more Ah
stringent than the
standard mentioned
in paragraph (a) or
(b).
$019.1 Prescribed tidal | PS19.1 = (s 6(2) solution) PS19.1 Strand Gardens
work that is a The design and submits the prescribed
retaining wall, construction of the tidal work is not for a .
revetment or retaining wall retaining wall
seawall, is designed revetment or seawall revetment or seawall, .*
@ and constructed in a is consistent with therefore SO19.1_ is -
way to ensure it is the following not applicable. *
able to support its standards— TH,
intended loads,
having regard to its (a) subject to
relevant loading paragraph (b), a
. matters retaining wall,
s revetment — or
seawall is able ra
to support at ,
least a 7
distributed live
load of 3.0kPa;
, (b) if a relevant
planning
scheme
standard is .
more stringent os
than the 2
“A
. oo
ss ——S SS 2 a
© Page 50 — AF
emanate . Response to Information Request OG
oy ® Coo woe : a,See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
001A333D.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
08/1704 - Response to Information Request [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.8 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.