Original source · versioned page text
2022-04-12 Services & Organisation Committee Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 APRIL 2022
However, due to the positive response to this tender from the market, the Procurement Team, in
consultation with legal, sought a revised evaluation strategy to (1) enable a continued streamlined
assessment of the responses in accordance with legislation, and (2) provide a facility (ROPS) that
could potentially be utilised by not only Noosa Shire Council, but Councils within Queensland, as
follows:
3. Sound Contracting Principles
In selecting a respondent, Council will have regard to the sound contracting principles described in
section 104 of the Local Government Act 2009 (Qld) as follows:
Principle How regard will be had to it
Value for money Council will conduct an open tender process which provides for a Schedule
of Rates which will be fixed for the duration of the term with the option to
revise after the panel. Council may use these Rates to assess value for
money before engaging a Supplier.
Open and effective Council will conduct an open tender process and has not included terms
competition which would unnecessarily restrict competition.
The development of Council will assess local industry participation as an evaluation criterion.
competitive local
business and industry
Environmental protection The terms of the contract require the successful respondent to comply with
all law, which includes law relating to the protection of the environment.
Ethical behaviour and fair Council will adhere to the Probity Requirements set out in this Procurement
dealing Probity Plan.
Criteria Criteria assessment question
Technical, Financial and Is there any evidence in the response that suggest the respondent does not
Managerial Capability have the necessary technical, financial and managerial capability?
Capability and Is there any evidence in the response to suggest that the respondent does
Resourcing not have the necessary capability and resourcing to necessary to perform
contracts on time and in accordance with agreed requirements?
Experience and Capacity Is there any evidence in the response to suggest that the respondent does
not have the necessary experience and capacity to perform contracts on time
and in accordance with agreed requirements?
Methodology Is there any evidence in the response to suggest that the respondent does
not use an appropriate and proven methodology that will enable the
respondent to perform contracts on time and in accordance with agreed
requirements?
Quality Assurance Is there any evidence in the response to suggest that the respondent does
not utilize quality assurance methods to ensure that the respondent can
perform contracts on time and in accordance with the agreed requirements?
Contribution to Local Is there any evidence in the response to suggest that the respondent in
Economy performing the contract, would not contribute to the local Noosa economy?
Price Is there any evidence in the response to suggest that the respondent, if
engaged to perform the contract, would not provide value for money?
As a result of the evaluation process, the panel recommends the respondents at Attachment 3 for
award to the panel arrangement, in accordance with each Separable Portion and category of service.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil.
Page 14 of 40
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.