Council archive · source document
Appendix B - Geotechnical Assessment · OPW23/0179
Project No. PG-10375 Page | 7 June 2023 Ref: PG-10375, 2023-06-09, LTR VER 1 Michael Cullen – Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Residence, 128 Gympie Terrace, Noosaville 9.0 BATTERS – SHORT TERM EXCAVATION PROFILE It is understood that cut batters to 3.0m in height will be required as part of the basement construction. Considering the proposed maximum height of cut, the following recommendations are made for the bulk excavation of the site. Batters < 2.0m in height • 1V:1.5H batter with crest of batter >2m from buildings or structures. Batters > 2.0m in height • 1V:1.5H batter with the crest of the batter at least 2.0m inside the site boundary. • 2.0m minimum distance from any building or structure. If batters are to be left exposed for an extended period of time, a battler angle of 1V:2H is recommended and berm widths are to be strictly maintained. The above batter slopes assume no seepage is present in the batters and the batters are above the water table. 10.0 TEMPORARY BATTER SUPPORT Where the excavations cannot be battered to a stable angle, they will need to be supported to prevent instability. Support systems could include: • Sheet Piles – It is expected that cantilevered sheet piles will be an acceptable retention system. Anchoring or cross-bracing of the excavation may be required. Due consideration should be given to the potential for anchor installation and vibration to adversely affect adjacent areas. • Contiguous Piles – whilst no vibration is associated with their installation, it is likely a more expensive solution. Where sheet piles are to installed through medium dense or ‘denser’ sands, pre-drilling may be required to ensure installation. Where sands are retained, shoring pressures should be based on the lateral earth pressure coefficients given in Table 3, in conjunction with a triangular pressure distribution where the pressure can be calculated from P=0.5ka H2, provided the excavation is not surcharged by adjacent buildings/services and some tolerance or movement exists. TABLE 3 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS Lateral Earth Pressure Coefficients Unit Weight Material Strength (K) (t/m3) Flexible Propped Very loose to loose 1.8 0.40 0.60 Sands Medium dense 2.0 0.30 0.50 Dense to very dense 2.1 0.25 0.45
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix B - Geotechnical Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.