Council archive · source document
Appendix B - Geotechnical Assessment · OPW23/0179
Project No. PG-10375 Page | 8 June 2023 Ref: PG-10375, 2023-06-09, LTR VER 1 Michael Cullen – Geotechnical Investigation - Proposed Residence, 128 Gympie Terrace, Noosaville Pressures for unsurcharged propped walls could be designed based on a uniform pressure distribution with depth, where the pressure P = 0.65ka H (kPa) where H is the depth of the excavation. The shoring wall should also be checked for a triangular distribution calculated using the lateral earth pressure coefficients present in Table 3 for a propped wall. The temporary support system should also take into consideration the possible needs to over-excavate the basement for ground improvement works. It should be noted that lateral deflection of the retention system will occur, irrespective of the retention system adopted. In additional to lateral movements, vertical movement of the soils behind the retention system will result. The effects of the vertical and horizontal movements may be seen at a distance equal to 2 or 3 times the height of the excavation. Subject to detailed design, movements as much as 1% to 2% of the depth of the excavation could occur behind a cantilevered pile wall. 11.0 PERMANENT RETAINING WALLS Basement walls should be designed using a pressure coefficient for the at rest case of K0 = 0.5. Unit wall force P is given by:- P = 0.5 K0 H12 (kN/m run of wall) Passive resistance at the base of the wall can be calculated from:- P = 0.5 Kp Hw2 where Kp = 3.00 (ignores wall friction effects) for loose sands 3.25 for medium dense sands 3.85 for very dense sands Hw = front face of wall contributing to passive resistance (m) For the sliding resistance calculation, the angle of friction for sand () compacted to not less than 75% density index can be taken as 32° for walls with a key. For walls 2 without a key, the angle of friction for sliding resistance should be taken as 3 or 21°. 12.0 BUILDING FOUNDATIONS Given the encountered subsurface profile, a high-level footing system would generally be suitable for the support of the proposed structure, with appropriate ground improvement works and due consideration of the potential hydrostatic uplift forces and the potential for weaker layers above the indurated sand.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix B - Geotechnical Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.2 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.