Original source · versioned page text
Assessment against provisions and benchmarks
SEMI‐ATTACHED HOUSING ZONE
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Complies Comments
(see Figure 9.1 and Figure 9.2);
d) break up building façades by incorporating different
but complimentary colours, textures and building
materials; and
e) visually break up the bulk of the building by
integrating tall plant species in front of and to the
side of buildings;
AND
Figure 9.2—Adding visual interest to facades
S38.3 For corner sites the building design addresses both
street frontages by—
a) including doors and windows on each face of the
building that fronts a road; and
b) incorporating an access point from each street, one for
each of the dwelling units.
THE BUILDING ABOVE IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE OUTCOMES AS THERE IS NO
ARTICULATION OR VISUAL INTEREST. THE FOLLOWING BUILDING IS CONSISTENT
AS IT IS WELL ARTICULATED, CREATES DIFFERENT SHADOW LINES AND IS
VISUALLY INTERESTING
Garages and carports
O39 Garages, carport structures and vehicle manoeuvring areas are S39.1 Garages and carports have a front boundary setback of S39.1‐39.6 Complies. The proposed
parking and carport structures is suitably
designed and sited to— at least 6m provided that garages may be setback 5.5m from
a) provide for resident and visitor parking; the front boundary where garage doors are staggered 1m sited with appropriate landscape
b) visually integrate with the building and to not dominate the street from each other in relation to the frontage treatment. The centre aisle is to the
front; Australian Standard for Parking and has
AND
JFP Ref: M2652/E2 Page 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.