Original source · versioned page text
05. Hales - Planning Report
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW20/0117 - 37 Mossman Crt Noosa Heads.
PROJECT URBAN – 20153 13 Jul 2020
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
b) if a relevant planning scheme standard preventing access along the
is more stringent than the standard in foreshore.
paragraph (a) – the relevant planning
scheme standard, to the extent it is
more stringent than the standard in
paragraph (a);
c) any other relevant planning scheme
standard that is not inconsistent with the
standards in paragraphs (a) and (b).
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
Public access – safety
9.1 The location and design Public access to State coastal land near the Compliant.
of prescribed tidal works prescribed tidal works is consistent with
does not adversely affect each relevant planning scheme standard. The proposed structure does
the safety of members of not affect the safety of
the public accessing State members of the public
coastal land. accessing the foreshores, as
there is no access along the
foreshore available.
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
Navigable access to, or egress from, lots that adjoin, or are in the immediate surroundings of, a lot connected
to prescribed tidal works
10.1 Prescribed tidal works The design and construction of the Compliant.
that are for a private prescribed tidal work is consistent with the
purpose do not adversely following standards:- The proposed structure does
affect navigable access to, a) subject to paragraph (b), not intrude within 3m of the
or navigable egress from, prescribed tidal works:- extended side boundaries.
any lot that adjoins, or is in i) for a lot connected to the
the immediate surroundings works for which there is a The proposed new boundary
of, a lot connected to water allocation area – are not wall structure is to be located
prescribed tidal works. constructed outside the water across the full width of the
allocation area; and property however it will not
ii) for a lot connected to works interfere with any navigable
for which there is no water access to or from neighbouring
allocation area – are no closer properties.
than 1.5m to that lot’s side
boundary or extended side
boundary;
b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) – the relevant
planning scheme standard, to the extent it
is more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a).
Development Assessment Report Page 19 of 42
Operational Works
37 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.