Original source · versioned page text
05. Hales - Planning Report
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW20/0117 - 37 Mossman Crt Noosa Heads.
PROJECT URBAN – 20153 13 Jul 2020
Performance Criteria Acceptable Solution Comments
Design, construction and safety – all prescribed tidal work
12.8 Appropriate measures The design and construction of the Not applicable.
are taken for prescribed prescribed tidal works is consistent with
tidal works for a non-private the following standards:- The proposed structure is for
purpose to ensure an a) subject to paragraph (b), prescribed private use.
unsupportable live load is tidal work has erected or placed in
not applied to the work by position on or near the work, a sign
persons or vehicles. that:-
(i) is visible at all times; and
(ii) states the maximum live load that
may be applied to the work, in
terms of the maximum number of
persons that may be on the work
at any given time or the maximum
number of vehicles of a particular
type that may be on or moored at
the work at any given time;
b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) – the
relevant planning scheme standard, to
the extent it is more stringent than that
mentioned in paragraph (a).
12.9 Prescribed tidal works, The design and construction of the Compliant.
other than a prescribed deck prescribed tidal works is consistent with
for a private purpose, are each relevant planning scheme standard. The proposed jetty structure is
designed and constructed compliant with Council
to ensure the use of tidal requirements. The proposed
water in a canal for a non- boundary wall will be
maritime purpose is constructed completely within
minimised. the freehold boundary.
12.10 Prescribed tidal (s 5(2) outcome) Not applicable.
works that are a prescribed The design and construction of the
deck and for a private prescribed deck is consistent with the The proposal is not a
purpose, are designed and following standards:- prescribed deck.
constructed in a way that a) subject to paragraph (c), a boardwalk
ensures the use of tidal or independent deck does not extend
water in a canal for a non- more than 3m from the waterfront
maritime purpose is boundary of the lot connected to the
minimised. boardwalk or deck;
b) subject to paragraph (c), a boardwalk
or independent deck is at least 3m
inside of the side boundary or
extended side boundary of the lot
connected to the boardwalk or deck;
c) if a relevant planning scheme standard
is more stringent than the standard
mentioned in paragraph (a) – the
Development Assessment Report Page 24 of 42
Operational Works
37 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.