Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

05. Hales - Planning Report

Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW20/0117 - 37 Mossman Crt Noosa Heads.

of 43

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

PROJECT URBAN – 20153                                                                              13 Jul 2020


 Performance Criteria           Acceptable Solution                             Comments
 Design, construction and safety – all prescribed tidal work
 12.8 Appropriate measures The design and construction of the                   Not applicable.
 are taken for prescribed prescribed tidal works is consistent with
 tidal works for a non-private the following standards:-                        The proposed structure is for
 purpose to ensure an a) subject to paragraph (b), prescribed                   private use.
 unsupportable live load is         tidal work has erected or placed in
 not applied to the work by         position on or near the work, a sign
 persons or vehicles.               that:-
                                    (i) is visible at all times; and
                                    (ii) states the maximum live load that
                                         may be applied to the work, in
                                         terms of the maximum number of
                                         persons that may be on the work
                                         at any given time or the maximum
                                         number of vehicles of a particular
                                         type that may be on or moored at
                                         the work at any given time;
                                b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
                                    is more stringent than the standard
                                    mentioned in paragraph (a) – the
                                    relevant planning scheme standard, to
                                    the extent it is more stringent than that
                                    mentioned in paragraph (a).
 12.9 Prescribed tidal works, The design and construction of the                Compliant.
 other than a prescribed deck prescribed tidal works is consistent with
 for a private purpose, are each relevant planning scheme standard.             The proposed jetty structure is
 designed and constructed                                                       compliant      with    Council
 to ensure the use of tidal                                                     requirements. The proposed
 water in a canal for a non-                                                    boundary      wall   will   be
 maritime      purpose       is                                                 constructed completely within
 minimised.                                                                     the freehold boundary.
 12.10       Prescribed tidal (s 5(2) outcome)                                  Not applicable.
 works that are a prescribed The design and construction of the
 deck and for a private prescribed deck is consistent with the                  The proposal       is   not      a
 purpose, are designed and following standards:-                                prescribed deck.
 constructed in a way that a) subject to paragraph (c), a boardwalk
 ensures the use of tidal           or independent deck does not extend
 water in a canal for a non-        more than 3m from the waterfront
 maritime      purpose       is     boundary of the lot connected to the
 minimised.                         boardwalk or deck;
                                b) subject to paragraph (c), a boardwalk
                                    or independent deck is at least 3m
                                    inside of the side boundary or
                                    extended side boundary of the lot
                                    connected to the boardwalk or deck;
                                c) if a relevant planning scheme standard
                                    is more stringent than the standard
                                    mentioned in paragraph (a) – the
Development Assessment Report                                                                       Page 24 of 42
Operational Works
37 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567
Log in to download the original file

05. Hales - Planning Report.pdf · 2.3 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.