05. Hales - Planning Report

PROJECT URBAN – 20153                                                                              13 Jul 2020


Performance Criteria            Acceptable Solution                            Comments
Design, construction and safety – boat ramps and slip ways for private purpose
                                    i)        forming grooves over the
                                              surface, as close as possible to
                                              40mm wide, 20mm deep and
                                              150mm apart, and at an angle
                                              as close as possible to 70
                                              degrees to the centre-line of
                                              the boat ramp or slip way;
                                    ii)       covering the surface with a
                                              substance ordinarily used on
                                              to prevent skidding;
                                    iii)      making, through a physical
                                              act, the surface coarse before
                                              it sets, including, for example,
                                              by raking the surface;
                                c) subject to paragraph (d), the upper
                                    surface of a boat ramp / slip way for
                                    which a winch is not used to hoist or
                                    haul vessels onto the boat ramp / slip
                                    way has a gradient not steeper than:-
                                    i) if the surface is treated by using a
                                         method mentioned in paragraph
                                         (b)(i) or (ii) – 1:7; or
                                    ii) otherside – 1:10;
                                d) if a relevant planning scheme standard
                                    is more stringent than the standard in
                                    paragraph (a), (b) or (c) – the relevant
                                    planning scheme standard, to the
                                    extent it is more stringent than the
                                    standard in paragraph (a), (b) or (c).

Performance Criteria            Acceptable Solution                             Comments
Design, construction and safety – bridges
14.1 Prescribed tidal works The design and construction of the bridge           Not applicable.
that are a bridge do not is consistent with:
adversely affect existing a) subject to paragraph (b), the clearance            The proposal is not a bridge.
public use of any tidal water,      levels under a bridge are high enough
including, for example, use of      to allow continued public use of any
the tidal water for canoeing,       tidal water over which it is constructed;
swimming         or      other b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
recreational activities.            is more stringent than the standard in
                                    paragraph (a) – the relevant planning
                                    scheme standard, to the extent it is
                                    more stringent than the standard in
                                    paragraph (a).




Development Assessment Report                                                                       Page 26 of 42
Operational Works
37 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567