05. Hales - Planning Report

PROJECT URBAN – 20153                                                                            13 Jul 2020


Performance Criteria            Acceptable Solution                           Comments
Design, construction and safety – bridges
14.2 Prescribed tidal works The design and construction of the bridge         Not applicable.
that are a bridge do not is consistent with:-
adversely affect the flow of a) subject to paragraph (b) –                    The proposal is not a bridge.
water under the bridge.              (i) if a bridge can be adequately
                                          supported without erecting or
                                          placing a foundation support in
                                          tidal water – no foundation
                                          support to support the bridge is
                                          erected or placed in the tidal
                                          water; or
                                     (ii) otherwise – only the minimum
                                          number of foundation supports
                                          required to support the bridge is
                                          used;
                                b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
                                    is more stringent than the standard in
                                    paragraph (a) – the relevant planning
                                    scheme standard, to the extent it is
                                    more stringent than the standard in
                                    paragraph (a).



Performance Criteria            Acceptable Solution                           Comments
Design, construction and safety – prescribed decks
15.1 Prescribed tidal works (s 5(2) outcome)                                  Not applicable.
that are a prescribed deck and The design and construction of the
for a private purpose are prescribed deck is consistent with:-                The proposal       is   not      a
designed and constructed in a a) subject to paragraph (b), each of the        prescribed deck.
way to ensure it is able to following Australian Standards to the
support its intended loads, extent requirements stated in the Standard
having regard to its relevant apply to relevant loading matters for the
loading matters.                design or construction of the prescribed
                                deck:-
                                         (i)     AS/NZS 1170.0;
                                         (ii)    AS/NZS 1170.1;
                                         (iii)   AS/NZS 1170.2;
                                         (iv)    AS 4997;
                                b) if a relevant planning scheme standard
                                is more stringent than the standard in
                                paragraph (a), (b) or (c) – the relevant
                                planning scheme standard, to the extent it
                                is more stringent than the standard in
                                paragraph (a), (b) or (c).
15.2 Prescribed tidal works (s 5(2) outcome)                                  Not applicable.
that are a prescribed deck and The design and construction of the
for a non-private purpose are prescribed deck is consistent with the          The proposed works is not a
designed and constructed in a following standards:-                           prescribed deck.
Development Assessment Report                                                                     Page 27 of 42
Operational Works
37 Mossman Court, Noosa Heads 4567