16-04-21 - 15128 - MorgansEngineers

                                                                       MORGAN CONSULTING
                                                                       E NGINEERS P TY LTD
                                                                                    15128/RP



  B)         Curve widening at the two sharp bends (at CH 20.00 and CH 80.00) that
             demonstrate two vehicles (Noosa RCV and B99 passenger car) can pass each
             other safely at these bends.

Response:    Please find attached the revised RCV Turning Plan (15128/SK30/A2) prepared
             by Morgan Consulting Engineers which demonstrates that an RCV can safely
             pass a B99 passenger car at the abovementioned bends.

  C)         Provide safe Sight Distances Analysis at the critical sections of the driveway
             particularly near the accesses to Block D and Block F.

  Response: Refer to the revised Concept Siteworks and Drainage Plans (15128/SK11/A2 &
            15128/SK12/A2) prepared by Morgan Consulting Engineers which detail the
            revised locations of the entrances to Block D and Block F. It is noted that in
            addition to relocating the Block D entrance, we propose to incorporate a
            10km/h speed zone near the entrance to Block D and install a mirror at the
            bend just south of Block D for patrons leaving the building. A sight distance of
            19m has been provided for patrons leaving Block D which is considered
            acceptable given the low speeds the internal road permits.

  D)         A turning circle 9.0m in radius at the two temporary cul-de-sac ends and
             showing the dimensions of the proposed access easements on Precinct F site.

Response:    Refer to the attached revised Siteworks and Drainage Plans prepared by
             Morgan Consulting Engineers detailing the requested 9.0m radius temporary
             cul-de-sacs within Precinct F.

  E)         A traffic median island (mountable if necessary) at the development site’s
             access point to discourage drivers from turning right when exiting the site.

Response:    The traffic median island at the site’s access point is not necessary as the cul-
             de-sac within Resort Drive already has a median with one way traffic control.
             Accordingly, the traffic median island has been omitted from the design.
             Alternatively, we propose to incorporate chevron line marking and a “No Right
             Turn” sign facing drivers exiting the site. This will be sufficient to discourage
             drivers from turning right.
Issue – Emergency Access
Item 8:       Demonstrate adequate accessibility provided for emergency vehicles and the
              like to serve all the building blocks.
Response:     Please find attached the Emergency Access Turning Plan (15128/SK31/A0)
              which demonstrates a 12.5m long single unit truck/bus representative of fire
              brigade trucks and other similar rigid vehicles can service the entire site in
              the case of an emergency. Furthermore, the provision of the emergency access
              turning plan demonstrates that all smaller service and emergency vehicles can
              access the site.
Issue – Stormwater
Item 9:       Demonstrate:
       A)    That all stormwater runoffs from the site for all storm events up to and
             including 1% AEP are maintained to the predevelopment runoff rates.

Response:     We confirm that attenuation of post-development stormwater runoff peak
              flow rates is not necessary on site. The downstream piped system has been

                                                                                        Page 2