2020-06-15 General Committee Agenda

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                          15 JUNE 2020




     Figure 2: Approved Block 14 – Basement – Floor      Figure 3: Proposed Block 14 – Basement – Floor
                          Plan                                        Plan (as constructed)


The request to change Block 14 – Basement – Floor Plan is accepted, as the Media room remains
unenclosed and, as such, does not constitute a bedroom and therefore does not increase the
density of the development. The following condition is recommended to ensure the Media room
remains unenclosed and the development density does not increase:
New Condition 97 – 18 June 2020
97.     The Media room in Unit 1401 must remain unenclosed and is not to be utilised as a bedroom.


Condition 5 and Condition 33
It is noted an administrative error occurred under the previous minor change application, which
resulted in two Condition 5s being listed in Decision Notice 132005.1133.10, issued on 18 October
2019. The second Condition 5 listed on the Decision Notice should have replaced existing
Condition 33. Therefore, the request to change Condition 5 and 33 will be assessed together.
5.      Carparking shall be provided within the site generally as shown on the approved plans.
        Carparking shall include a minimum of:
        a.    For the Multiple Dwelling Unit component:
              i.     224 covered spaces;
              ii.    17 uncovered spaces; and
              iii.   35 uncovered spaces to be located within the common property, designated as
                     visitor parking and accessible at all times.
        b.    For the Resort Facilities Building component:
              i.     41 uncovered spaces are to be located within the common property and accessible
                     at all times, including 5 to be designated as staff parking.
              ii.    All 41 spaces are to be provided within proximity of the Resort Facilities Building,
                     that is, not located along the proposed new road along the eastern property
                     boundary.

                                                                                          Page 25 of 52