Original source · versioned page text
Town Planning Report and Appendices - Cooroibah
Attached to the e-mail Development Permit – 23 Jirrima Crescent, Cooroibah MCU16/0099.
The original of this document is very large (14.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
AO20.2 The drownout characteristics of the waterway N/A The design of a drownout is not required as the proposed
barrier allow for adequate fish passage at the site. works do not result in a barrier to fish passage.
And
AO20.3 At drownout, the conditions at the barrier are N/A Refer to Response AO20.2.
such that:
(1) the tailwater and headwater levels across the weir
are essentially equal
(2) velocities are sufficiently low for fish passage (e.g.
0.3 metres/second) at or close to the edge of the
spillway crest
(3) the weir is fully submerged to a sufficient depth to
allow for fish passage, and for the species and size
classes of fish moving through the site to cross the
weir
(4) to the degree that provides for adequate fish passage
at the site.
And
AO20.4 The frequency, timing and duration of drownout N/A Refer to Response AO20.2.
conditions are adequate for the movement requirements
of the fish community moving past the barrier.
And
AO20.5 Delays to fish passage when there are flows in N/A The proposed works involve the replacement of an existing
the system but no fish passage in the rising hydrograph culvert.
are accurately defined for the design, and avoided or The proposed works will not result in delays to fish passage.
limited to a maximum of three days.
And
AO20.6 In assessing whether the inherent barrier design N/A The proposed works involve the replacement of an existing
provides adequate fish passage, impacts on lateral and culvert.
longitudinal fish movement are considered. As the proposed works will not create a barrier to fish
movement, the works maintain for adequate fish passage
and further assessment is not required.
PO21 The use of floodgates is avoided AO21.1 There is an overriding need for new floodgates, N/A Floodgates are not proposed as part of this application.
or minimised. and other alternatives are unviable.
And
AO21.2 Hydraulic conditions through the floodgates are N/A Refer to Response AO21.1.
State development assessment provisions Module 5 — Fisheries resources 5.2 Constructing or raising waterway barrier works in fish habitats state code
22 July 2016 V1.9 Page 13 of 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.