Original source · versioned page text
Town Planning Report and Appendices - Cooroibah
Attached to the e-mail Development Permit – 23 Jirrima Crescent, Cooroibah MCU16/0099.
The original of this document is very large (14.9 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
capabilities; and Medium Potential Bushfire
3. Directly, indirectly and Intensity areas. However,
cumulatively avoids an the proposed compound
increase in the severity area is not identified to be
of the natural hazards within these areas, and
and the potential for instead is located within the
damage on the site or to Potential Impact Buffer.
other properties; and Nonetheless, the proposed
4. Avoids risks to public facility will not increase the
safety and the habitable footprint or
environment from the number of dwellings in the
location of hazardous bushfire impact area. A
materials and the telecommunications facility
release of these on the subject site will not
materials as a result of increase community risk,
a natural hazard; and vulnerability, exposure or
Maintains or enhances sensitivity to bushfire
natural processes and the hazard, given that
protective function of hazardous or combustible
landforms and vegetation materials are not stored on
that can mitigate risks site.
associated with the natural
hazard
Biodiversity – A development application The subject site is identified
• MSES - Wildlife where the land relates to a under the SPP mapping as
habitat matter of state containing Wildlife Habitat,
• MSES – Regulated environmental significance, and Regulated Vegetation
Vegetation if the application is for: (intersecting a
(intersecting a (a) operational work, or watercourse).
watercourse) (b) a material change of The proposed facility is not
use other than for a considered to negatively
dwelling house, or impact upon Matters of
(c) reconfiguring a lot State Environmental
that results in more than six Significance (MSES), for the
lots or lots less than five following reasons:
hectares.
• No works or vegetation
clearing within the
Development:
Wildlife Habitat areas on
(1) enhances matters of site is proposed for
state environmental
either the
significance where possible, Telecommunications
and
Facility or waterway
(2) identifies any potential barrier works;
significant adverse • The waterway barrier
environmental impacts on works associated with
matters of state
Page 33
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.