Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda

of 25

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

Page 17 of 25

RISKS                                                                       =
      1.  Asset deterioration and structural failure              Asset condition
          (public liability);                                     The overall level of confidence of asset condition for
      2.  Poor construction techniques and inferior               parks, playgrounds and neerree 6 low to moderate
                pee                                               based on the compliance risk inspections
          maeneHals,                                              undertaken. It is recommended that asset condition is
      3.  Contributed    assets   not   meeting    the            based on the below 1 to 5 rating for each of the asset
          required levels of service or fit for purpose;          classes across the network.
      4.  Vandalism     to   playground    and    park            Therefore the current condition profile represented in
          ecuiveniict:                                            the graph below is based on an aged base condition
           aulP      ‘    xe                                      rather than the physical condition. This plan has
      5.  A lack of condition ‘knowledge Berea the                previously identified inaccuracies in acquisition dates
          network     contributing   to _ illinformed             that greatly affect our assets remaining life. The first
          decisions                                               improvement in condition data is to record the 1 to 5
                                                                  ratings of all asset classes within the asset system.

                                                                                        ESSE
                                                                       [SECT  (OEEoa ceed
                                                                               Very Good Condition
      Asset renewal                                                        LT  Cay iinied aslamaxcoaaned
      Although the existing renewal activities are a                       Pr       eee
                       :                     4                                  inor maintenance required (5%)
      result of asset failure and defect detection, the                        Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
      development of a long term renewal programme                        3    Level of Service   ;
      through the physical asset condition assessments                         SARACEN EASE ere        20 7)
        pe                  nae        alas                                    Requires Renewal
      will improve the capability of predicting suitable                   5)  Gerckcah sebeiadlupgade tomes a0%)
      intervention timeframes.                                             5 _ Asset Unserviceable
      peltemidy Crete: Seiriuirmel es praygrounds on              The Physical ca cueeenas aeduae        the “core as t
          4                  ‘   A  >   ath  ed                     e                  i ff   a        g          Se}
      require renewal and while risk i. minimised                 management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
      through the proactive compliance inspections,               International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
      there is not a detailed, prioritised or consistent          for the majority of Council's infrastructure.
      approach in renewal.
      Playground assets have shorter life spans than
      other assets within parks, and the management
      and renewal of these assets is managed in
      accordance with Australian Standards. It is
      recognised that assets in high profile areas                   3                                 *3
      exceed the average use and will reach their end                &            Age Based Condition
      of life earlier than other equipment.                          iy                          i
                               quip                                     g                  Profile
                                                                     “Ss
      In the current 5 year capital program there are                2
                    ;        :                                            20,000
      annual allocations provided for the renewal of                  e
      playground equipment, park shelters and park                   é
      furniture. This the first step in developing more                            ii    if    (4            es
      robust longer term renewal programmes for these                          0
      asset classes.                                                                 1     2     3     4     5
                                                                                       Condition Rating

     Improvement Plan
         1.  Continue with cyclical maintenance inspections across park and playground infrastructure with results and
             overall asset condition (based on the core asset management approach) recorded in asset system;
         2.  Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and Inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
             within the asset system;
         3.  Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
             deterioration modelling;
a        4.  Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
             specific to playground equipment, park furniture, shelters, shade sails and natural reserves.

      NOOSA COUNCIL                    PO Box 141                     P. (07) 5329 6500          [email protected]
      t Set ID: 199618:                TEWANTIN QLD 4565              F. (07) 5329 6501          www.noosa.qld.gov.au

                                                                                                          Page 17 of 25
Log in to download the original file

2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda(PDF, 5MB).pdf · 5.4 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.