Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Original source · versioned page text

2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda

of 25

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

Page 19 of 25

RISKS
       1.  Trip hazards (public liability).
       2.  Structural failure of boardwalks.
       3.  Non-conforming pathway.                                 Asset condition
       4.  A lack of condition knowledge across the                The overall level of confidence of asset condition for
           network     contributing   to    ill-informed           pathways and boardwalks is low to moderate, based
           decisions                                               on the cyclical trip hazard and boardwalk structures
                                                                   risk inspections. Currently these inspections are not
                                                                   consistently recorded as they only address defects
                                                                   and the overall deterioration issues associated with
                                                                   these assets.
      Asset renewal
      Although the existing renewal activities are a               Asset condition assessment based on the below 1 to
      result of asset failure and defect detection, the            5 rating for each of the asset classes across pathway
      development of a long term renewal programme                 and boardwalk network is required.
      through physical asset condition assessments will                             -                       .
      improve the capability of predicting suitable                The current condition profile represented in the graph
      intervention timeframes.                                     below is based on an aged base condition rather than
                                                                   the physical condition. This plan identifies
      There are two major (>$500k) renewals proposed               inaccuracies in acquisition dates that greatly affect
      for pathway and boardwalk assets in the current              assets remaining lives.
      5 year capital programme, these include:                              :            :      55        .
      e   Park Road boardwalk, approx. $5m;                        The first improvement in condition data is to record
      *   Noosa Main Beach boardwalk, approx. $750k                the 1 to 5 ratings of all asset classes within the asset
          (surf club to Park Road link).                           system.
      These are significant and high profile assets that
      have reached the end of their useful lives. The                              Sa     —-——
      development of a cyclical renewal programme                             Vary Good Condition
      that is integrated with financial planning is the                  1   Only normal mainetnance required
      goal in progressing good asset management                          2 _ Minor Defects Only
      practices.                                                              Minor maintenance required (5%)
                                                                              Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
                                                                         3    Level of Service
                                                                              Significant maintenance required (10-20%)
                                                                         4    Requires Renewal
                                                                              Significant renewal/upgrade required (20-40%)
          g                             e,s                                  Asset Unserviceable
         3   Age Based Condition                                         2   Over 50% of Asset requires replacement  5
          3 So           P rofi le                                 The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
         2 m                                                       management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
            YZ                                                     International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
          3  40,000                                               for the majority of Council's infrastructure.
         S   20,000           5     i
                   0   oa
                       ul     2     3     4     5
                         Condition Rating

     Improvement Plan
        1.  Continue with cyclical maintenance inspections across park and playground infrastructure with results and
            overall asset condition (based on the core asset management approach) recorded in the asset system;
        2.  Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and Inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
            within the asset system;
  4     3.  Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
y           deterioration modelling;
        4.  Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
            specific to pathways and boardwalk assets.

       NOOSA COUNCIL                    PO Box 141                     P. (07) 5329 6500         [email protected]
       r Set ID? 499618:                TEWANTIN QLD 4565              F. (07) 5329 6501         www.noosa.qld.gov.au

                                                                                                          Page 19 of 25
Log in to download the original file

2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda(PDF, 5MB).pdf · 5.4 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.