Original source · versioned page text
2015-10-13 Infrastructure & Services Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Page 19 of 25
RISKS
1. Trip hazards (public liability).
2. Structural failure of boardwalks.
3. Non-conforming pathway. Asset condition
4. A lack of condition knowledge across the The overall level of confidence of asset condition for
network contributing to ill-informed pathways and boardwalks is low to moderate, based
decisions on the cyclical trip hazard and boardwalk structures
risk inspections. Currently these inspections are not
consistently recorded as they only address defects
and the overall deterioration issues associated with
these assets.
Asset renewal
Although the existing renewal activities are a Asset condition assessment based on the below 1 to
result of asset failure and defect detection, the 5 rating for each of the asset classes across pathway
development of a long term renewal programme and boardwalk network is required.
through physical asset condition assessments will - .
improve the capability of predicting suitable The current condition profile represented in the graph
intervention timeframes. below is based on an aged base condition rather than
the physical condition. This plan identifies
There are two major (>$500k) renewals proposed inaccuracies in acquisition dates that greatly affect
for pathway and boardwalk assets in the current assets remaining lives.
5 year capital programme, these include: : : 55 .
e Park Road boardwalk, approx. $5m; The first improvement in condition data is to record
* Noosa Main Beach boardwalk, approx. $750k the 1 to 5 ratings of all asset classes within the asset
(surf club to Park Road link). system.
These are significant and high profile assets that
have reached the end of their useful lives. The Sa —-——
development of a cyclical renewal programme Vary Good Condition
that is integrated with financial planning is the 1 Only normal mainetnance required
goal in progressing good asset management 2 _ Minor Defects Only
practices. Minor maintenance required (5%)
Maintenance Required To Return to Accepted
3 Level of Service
Significant maintenance required (10-20%)
4 Requires Renewal
Significant renewal/upgrade required (20-40%)
g e,s Asset Unserviceable
3 Age Based Condition 2 Over 50% of Asset requires replacement 5
3 So P rofi le The Physical Asset Condition is measured using the “core asset
2 m management approach” based on a 1 - 5 scale from the IIMM,
YZ International Edition 2011. This is a universal approach being used
3 40,000 for the majority of Council's infrastructure.
S 20,000 5 i
0 oa
ul 2 3 4 5
Condition Rating
Improvement Plan
1. Continue with cyclical maintenance inspections across park and playground infrastructure with results and
overall asset condition (based on the core asset management approach) recorded in the asset system;
2. Reconcile financial asset data, GIS data and Inspection data to ensure a single point of truth for asset data
within the asset system;
4 3. Develop a long term asset replacement programme integrated with financial planning and asset
y deterioration modelling;
4. Produce ‘next generation’ Asset Management Plans at a lower level of asset class hierarchy, for example
specific to pathways and boardwalk assets.
NOOSA COUNCIL PO Box 141 P. (07) 5329 6500 [email protected]
r Set ID? 499618: TEWANTIN QLD 4565 F. (07) 5329 6501 www.noosa.qld.gov.au
Page 19 of 25See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.