Original source · versioned page text
UPDATED DA - Attachment 8 - Flora and Fauna Assessment
Native Foresters 4.2 Flora assessment 4.2.1 Vegetation communities in the impact area The vegetation community in the western parcel consists of high value regrowth that is moderately weedy at the southern end transitioning to predominantly native at the northern end. Dominant species in the canopy are Paperbark tea-tree (Melaleuca quinquenervia) and Scribbly gum (Eucalyptus racemosa). In the midstorey, White hazelwood (Symplocos stawellii), Wild quince (Guioa semiglauca), Cheese tree (Glochidion ferdinandi) and Red ash (Alphitonia excelsa) are dominant. The understory is variable. Some areas are predominantly Bracken fern (Pteridium esculentum) with native sedges, grasses and grass trees (e.g. Schoenus brevifolius, Imperata cylindrica, Entolasia stricta, Lomandra spp, Xanthorrhoea sp), however other areas adjacent to the rainwater tanks and roadways are dominated by non-native species (e.g. Sphagneticola trilobata, Ardisia japonica). There are also elements of wet heath in the north-eastern section with species such as Prickly moses (Acacia hubbardiana), Wallum hakea (Hakea actities) and Queensland wax flower (Philotheca queenslandica). Median canopy height is 15 metres and canopy cover is approximately 30%. Species composition is characteristic of the Endangered RE 12.5.3 – Scribbly gum woodland on remnant tertiary surfaces / weathered sandstone. See Figure 3 for examples of some of the vegetation in the western parcel. The northern edge of the eastern parcel is mapped as remnant RE 12.5.3, however the flora survey found that the patch consisted of young regrowth dominated by Paperbark tea-tree (Figure 4a). Most trees were dbh 200mm or less, with one individual with dbh 500mm the largest tree in the parcel (Figure 4b). Scattered Black she-oak (Allocasuarina littoralis) were also present, however no eucalypts occurred in the parcel. The drain through the area was not flowing during the survey, however surface water was present behind the concrete containment area at the southern end of the parcel where planted Creek Mat-rush (Lomandra hystrix) was dominant (Figure 4c). Weeds were prominent around the around the open edges of the site (Figure 4d), while a dense carpet of Singapore daisy was present across much of the site (see Figure 4a). Vegetation was generally found to be in moderate condition across both parcels, with a diversity of native flora species alongside patchy weed incursions, particularly dense infestations of Singapore daisy and a proliferation of the non-local native tree Brown silky oak (Grevillea baileyana). Vegetation condition improves away from the edges where landfill influences diminish. State RE mapping has predominantly designated Site A as non-remnant Category X vegetation. Analysis of aerial history suggests that the vegetation was cleared in 1967 and grazed until 1971, followed by a period of growth (Appendix K). Since 1984, it has not been cleared, except for the road edges near the entrance which were cleared when the waste facility was established in the late 1980s. As such it should be considered high value regrowth (40 years old) that is approaching the structural and compositional thresholds of a remnant ecosystem. Some of the scattered remnant Scribbly gums (Eucalyptus racemosa) in the western parcel are large (dbh 700 – 1,000 mm) and are of hollow-bearing age (see Figure 3) which indicates that scattered trees were retained as shade trees when the area was cleared in 1967. See Figure 2 and Appendix M for locations and details of larger trees, SL plants and other habitat features __________________________________________________________________________________ Noosa Landfill & Resource Recovery Centre Expansion – Site A, Rev 2 – Fauna & Flora Assessment 19
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.