ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 16 OCTOBER 2025 · 2025-10-16 Ordinary Meeting Minutes

ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES                                                   16 OCTOBER 2025


                               planning scheme and contributes to building bulk and provides
                               opportunities for overlooking to adjacent properties.
                           f. The proposed roof top terrace creates opportunities for potential
                               privacy impacts on neighbouring properties due to overlooking.
                     2.   The proposal does not comply with Overall Outcomes 9.4.1.2 (2) (a)
                          (b) (c) and Performance Outcome 6 and Acceptable Outcomes
                          6.1and 6.2 of the Driveways and Parking Code as:
                           a. Sufficient carparking is not available on site to accommodate the
                               likely demand for carparking on site and the site is located where
                               on street parking is insufficient and undesirable.
                           b. The proposed car stacker is not suitable for parking as it lacks
                               sufficient clearance for operation and is impractical for use by
                               guests and staff unfamiliar with such systems.
                           c. The development does not provide the required number of
                               functional car spaces including service vehicles as the proposed
                               bus park is not sized to accommodate a small rigid vehicle.
                           d. No provision has been made for motorcycles and bicycles.
                     3.   The proposed does not comply with Performance Outcome 7 and
                          Acceptable Outcome AO7.1 of the Driveways and Parking Code as:
                           a. The development fails to provide adequate loading and
                               manoeuvring areas on site to accommodate the anticipated
                               service vehicles.
                     4.   The proposal is not consistent with Overall Outcome 9.4.10.2 (2)
                          (d) and Performance and Acceptable Outcomes PO3, AO3.2(b),
                          AO3.2(d), AO3.2(e) and AO3.2(f) of the Waste Management Code
                          as:
                           a. The development has not adequately demonstrated that waste
                               can be serviced on site.
                           b. The proposed waste storage area has not been designed to
                               allow for unobstructed access for collection by service vehicles
                               (i.e., on-site servicing).
                           c. Kerbside servicing is unable to occur while remaining clear from
                               all existing on-street carparks, pedestrian footpaths and without
                               impeding traffic flow on Russell Street.
                     5.   The proposal is not consistent with Performance Outcome PO9 and
                          the corresponding Acceptable outcomes AO9.1 & AO9.2 of the
                          Visitor accommodation Code as:
                           a. The proposed area of landscaping is significantly less than the
                               area required by the planning scheme;
                           b. The proposed landscaping widths to side and rear boundaries
                               are significantly less than that required by the planning scheme;
                           c. The undersupply of onsite landscaping area and widths to
                               boundaries results in a development which restricts the ability to
                               incorporate landscaping between the site and neighbouring
                               premises / buildings and to assist with softening the built form.
            There are no relevant reasons to approve the proposed development to vary from
            development intensity specified by the Noosa Plan 2020 for this area.
                     B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the
                        Planning Act 2016.
                     C. Note the report incorrectly identifies the required number of bicycle
                        spaces and motorcycle spaces which should each be identified as 7.