Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 13 - Code Assessment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO5 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a state-
AO5.1 Upgrade works on a state-controlled road are Not applicable. Upgrade works in the vicinity of the
controlled road are built in accordance with relevant
designed and constructed in accordance with the Road subject site are not anticipated.
design standards. Planning and Design Manual, 2nd edition, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
PO6 Development involving the haulage of fill, AO6.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material is not Not applicable. The proposed development is not
extracted material or excavated spoil material transported to or from the development site on a expected to involve the haulage of material exceeding
exceeding 10,000 tonnes per year does not damage state-controlled road. 10,000 tonnes.
the pavement of a state-controlled road.
Note: It is recommended that a transport
infrastructure impact assessment and pavement
impact assessment are provided, prepared in
accordance with the Guide To Traffic Impact
Assessment, Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2017.
PO7 Development does not adversely impact on the AO7.1 Development does not require a new railway Not applicable. The proposed development, and
safety of a railway crossing. crossing. associated works, is well removed from the north coast
OR rail line and impacts from (or to) same are therefore
Note: It is recommended that a traffic impact not anticipated.
assessment be prepared to demonstrate compliance AO7.2 A new railway crossing is grade separated.
with this performance outcome. An impact on a level
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
crossing may require an Australian Level Crossing
Assessment Model (ALCAM) assessment to be
AO7.3 Upgrades to a level crossing are designed and
undertaken. Section 2.2 – Railway crossing safety of
constructed in accordance with AS1742.7 – Manual of
the Guide to Development in a Transport Environment:
uniform traffic control devices, Part 7: Railway
Rail, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2015,
crossings and applicable rail manager standard
provides guidance on how to comply with this
drawings.
performance outcome.
Note: It is recommended a traffic impact assessment
be prepared to demonstrate compliance with this
acceptable outcome. An impact on a level crossing may
require an Australian Level Crossing Assessment Model
(ALCAM) assessment to be undertaken. Section 2.2 –
Railway crossing safety of the Guide to Development in
Page 16 of 23
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.