Council archive · source document
00154413.001
Text sections not matched to the original PDF pages. See original document to check page numbers.
Proposal Report Proposed Material Chonge of Use of Premises for a Multiple Housing - Type 2 Duplex at 305 Gympie Terrace, Noosaville described as Lot 2 on RP65319 Parish of Weyba Applicant: Pam & Roger Lever 6 Development Assessment The Noosa Plan includes the site in the Noosaville locality and provides the site with an Attached Housing zone. The assessment table for the Attached Housing zone indicates that a Multiple Housing - Type 2 - Duplex is code assessable development. It is noted that the site is similar to the surrounding area however is differentiated from the surrounding area under the Noosa Plan in terms of height and population density. The Noosa Plan b) do not exceed a building height of — i, for the Attached Housing Zone 2 storeys unless located on property with frontage to the following streets: - - Russell St, William St and Howard St, or Weyba Rd, James St and Albert St north of their intersections with Elizabeth St, where they are not to exceed a maximum building height of 3 storeys; The site and the adjoining site to the west do not have frontage to the above streets and therefore have a height of 2 storeys and 8 metres compared to the surrounding properties which have a height of 3 storeys and 12 metres. The Noosa Plan further indicates a population density of 700 persons per @ hectare for the site which is less than that previously permitted under the superseded scheme. S (Detached Housing , © Semi-Attached Housing Sp, DAttached Housing D OVisitor Mixed Use eS ; C) Neighbourhood Centre f 5 on Ss Ci Business Centre \ DP \, W@ Shire Business Centre ‘ oO SIN [|Community Services ~ ‘ oN \ Ci industry t a og enna Rural an (C1 Open Space Recreation Sue =F C1 Open Space Conservation Extract Noosa Plan As illustrated by the above extract of the Noosa Plan, only two sites including the subject site are not able to be developed for three storey units and are disadvantaged by the provisions of the Noosa Plan. Advice from Councils Manager of Strategic Planning Ms Rowena Skinner advised that this differentiation of the sites appeared to be a mistake in the scheme and that it should have the same @ development rights as the surrounding Attached Housing precinct. Again the provisions of the new scheme penalise the development of the site. It is noted that the applicant could lodge a development application under the superseded scheme however the units have been designed in accordance with the provisions of the Noosa Plan (except in relation to height and density) and the time frame under the superseded scheme is much faster. A comparison of the proposal against the requirements of the Noosaville Locality Code, the Residential Uses Code, Noosaville Attached Housing Code and the Landscaping Code is detailed in Annexure C, D, E and F. As indicated above, separate applications for Operational Works Landscaping and Engineering works will be lodged with Council. 6.1 Overlays Two Overlays are relevant for the subject site and include: « Natural Hazard: Landslide & Flooding Overlay - Flood Hazard Area * Natural Hazard: Bushfire & Acid Sulphate Soils - High Potential Acid Sulphate Area. A comparison of the proposal against these Overlays is included in Annexure G. ee S22 martoo consulting - Town Planning + Urban Design Consultants 7
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
00154413.001.pdfRelated documentPublic source context ↗
07/1022 - MCU - Multiple Housing Type 2 - Duplex [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.5 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.