Original source · versioned page text
Compiled Reference Documents - MCU25/0091 (As Published)
Very large file (15.0 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Original PDF page 10, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Wingara Hills Pty Ltd
6.2 Stability Risk Assessment
A qualitative slope stability risk assessment has been carried out following the Australian Geomechanics
Society (AGS) Guidelines for Landslide Risk Management (March 2007). The risk assessment relates to
property and potential development. Relative levels of risk and their implications are given in Table 2 below
and the qualitative terminology (i.e. likelihood and consequence definitions) for use in assessing risk to
property are attached in Appendix C.
Table 1: Stability Risk Levels
Risk Level Example Implications(1)
Unacceptable without treatment. Extensive detailed investigation and research,
VERY HIGH planning and implementation of treatment options essential to reduce risk to
VH
RISK Low; may be too expensive and not practical. Work likely to cost more than
value of property.
Unacceptable without treatment. Detailed investigation, planning and
H HIGH RISK implementation of treatment options required to reduce risk to Low. Work would
cost a substantial sum in relation to the value of the property.
May be tolerated in certain circumstances (subject to regulators’ approval) but
MODERATE requires investigation, planning and implementation of treatment options to
M
RISK reduce risk to Low. Treatment options to reduce to Low risk should be
implemented as soon as practicable.
L LOW RISK Usually acceptable to regulators. Where treatment has been required to reduce
the risk to this level, ongoing maintenance required.
VERY LOW
VL Acceptable. Manage by normal slope maintenance procedures.
RISK
Note: (1) The implications for a particular situation are to be determined by all parties to the risk assessment and may
depend on the nature of the property at risk; these are only given as a general guide.
The risk assessment essentially involves combining the elements of ‘Likelihood’ and ‘Consequence’ for the
potential hazards identified across the proposed development area in a qualitative manner. Relative levels of
risk and their implications are given in Table 3.
It should be noted that the stability assessment above relates to the global stability of the areas surrounding
the proposed development (as shown in Figure 1). Our assessment does not include areas surrounding the
existing residence.
Table 2: Qualitative Risk Assessment for Property (Based on AGS 2007).
Assessed
Hazard Likelihood Consequence Comments
Risk
The likelihood of shallow failure is assessed as Unlikely
due to the absence of groundwater (during our
investigation), the nature of the soils found in our
Shallow failure investigation and site slopes directing water away from
of soils above the proposed development. The consequence is
Unlikely Minor Low
the footing considered Minor, if the structures are lightweight/flexible
zone and founded well into the very stiff to hard extremely
weathered material or mudstone underlying weathered at
depths below about 1.2 m BGL as recommended in this
report. The resultant risk is Low.
Deep-seated
failure through
very stiff to A likelihood of Rare is assessed for global instability due
hard residual to the competent nature of the residual soils, weathered
Rare Medium Low
soils; extremely materials; and mudstone. A consequence of Medium has
weathered been assigned, with a resultant risk of Low.
material or
weathered rock
J002915-001-R-Rev0 7
Document Set ID: 24031832
Version: 1, Version Date: 14/08/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.