Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix G Water and Sewer Analysis

of 31

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

                       WATER SUPPLY AND SEWER NETWORK ANALYSIS
Client: Noosa Shire Council                        Location: 62 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy

the DMA, excluding the failing nodes, the service pressure is above 22m and is therefore
considered to be acceptable.


                            Table 3 –Peak Hour Pressure Analysis Results
                                                        Pressure (m)
               Year        Node            Pre-            Post-
                                                                         % Difference
                                       development      development
               2021     UW1686               -              31.5              -

                        NOON122            <0               <0                -

               2036     UW1686               -              30.7              -

                        NOON122            <0               <0                -


2.5 Fire Flow
For the purpose of the model, each node in the development was assigned a 15 L/s fire flow
demand for residential. Using the assigned fire flow demand for the proposed development nodes
and the existing fire flow demands assigned by Unitywater to the existing network a fire flow event
was simulated for each fire node individually. All fire nodes in the model were analysed to
determine their minimum residual pressure during a fire flow event at that hydrant. The worst case
2/3 PH background demand occurred at approximately 4:30pm. As such this was the start time for
the fire flow analysis.

In both the pre-development and post-development scenarios several nodes in the existing
network had residual pressure below 12m during a fire flow event. These nodes have been
included in Appendix B. It is noted that the residual pressure at these nodes was not noticeably
worsened in the post-development cases and therefore the addition of the proposed development
did not have a worsening effect on the network with regards to fire flow.

In all scenarios, except for the failing nodes, all hydrants maintained adequate pressure during a
fire flow analysis. The results for the most critical node (UW1686) in the proposed development
and the most critical node in the DMA (NTHWJ002542) are shown in Table 4 and Appendix B.


                                  Table 4 – Fire Flow Analysis Results

                                                      Residual Pressure (m)
             Year          Node              Pre-            Post-
                                                                           % Difference
                                         development      development
             2021       UW1686                   -           28.00                -

                      NTHWJ002542                <0            <0                 -

             2036       UW1686                   -           27.83                -

                      NTHWJ002542                <0            <0                 -




Covey Associates Pty Ltd                         4                                    Project No: 233467
Consulting Engineers                                                                  M23-0030Rpt Iss A
Log in to download the original file

Appendix G Water and Sewer Analysis.pdf · 7.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.