Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

19660 OPW26-0033 - response to info request

of 9
Response

As per our discussions and emails with Daniel Epps, we consider that the stormwater design
provided does comply with conditions 37 & 38 of the higher order approval. In addition, we have
checked Council's PSP for Stormwater design standards that apply and it refers to QUDM
(extract below - item 1 (a) (i)). QUDM requires urban drainage in low density areas to be
designed to convey Q2 (AEP 39%) - extract attached (table 7.3.1).

PLANNING SCHEME EXTRACT




QUDM EXTRACT




As such, the HGL shown on our long section drawings for a Q2 event is the correct design
event and confirms that the pits downstream of pit 6/A will not surcharge. We have removed
reference to surcharge pits on the long section which was a drafting error.
                                                                                        Page 5 of 9
                                                                     Tod Job Number: 19660-OPW2-A

Log in to download the original (19660 OPW26-0033 - response to info request.pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.