Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

Further Advice Response

of 4

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Although a very small portion of the building presents as three storeys from the south, the proposal is
within the 8 metre height limit, which does not result in an unreasonable obstruction of view lines and
does not result in overshadowing of adjoining neighbours. A low gradient roof pitch is proposed to keep
building height and bulk to a minimum as the site falls away from the frontage. The proposal presents as
two storeys when viewed from Plover Street.

Letters of support have been obtained from both adjoining neighbours in relation to the side setback
encroachments. Apart from the media room, which is a solid wall with no openings and has a length of
approximately 4.0m, the remainder of the side setback intrusions relate to eaves or planters. The setback
intrusions are not considered to adversely compromise the amenity of adjoining neighbours or cause any
privacy/overlooking concerns.

Item 2

Provide amended plans that comply with Acceptable Outcome AO5 and PO4 of the Coastal
Protection and Scenic Amenity overlay code (acknowledging only the stairs are accepted).

Item 3

Provide amended plans that do not include retaining structures on the rear boundary.

Response: The Proposal Plans have been amended to remove the portion of deck along the southern
side of the existing pool to be setback 6.0 metres from the rear boundary in accordance with PO4 of the
Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code.

The pool deck to the northern side of the pool has been maintained (this section of deck can be
cantilevered if required). We note that this portion of the deck is less than 1.0 metre above ground level,
and does not go forward of the line of the existing pool as discussed on site. Refer to Figures 1 and 2
below showing this outcome. There is already an elevated pool and deck in this location, as we seek to
remove the elevated deck and replace it with a much lower deck very close to ground level.

Landscaping can be provided in the rear portion of the site where practical in accordance with PO5/AO5
of the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code.




                Figure 1: Section showing the existing deck is less than 1.0m above ground level




                                                                                                         2
Log in to download the original file

Further Advice Response.pdf · 4.6 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.