Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

Traffic Impact Statement

of 52

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

                                                                                                        51 Elanda Street TIS
                                                                                                                 2024-11-25



         in Australia is 1.88m. Vans and off-road vehicles used as private passenger vehicles need to be catered
         for. The majority of these are <2m”
         The proposed height clearance of car stackers comply with these requirements, however it should be
         noted that car stackers are designed in accordance with AS5124 and not AS2890.1:2004 or that of the
         and as such height clearances of >2.1m are commonly not manufactured.
      2. Single platform as per the plans will be sufficient with a width of 2.85m and clear platform width as
         per Klaus specifications. Shop drawings will be refined by the manufacturer based on the layout
         requirements. Refer to Appendix B for swept paths.
      3. The parking bay lengths are proposed to be 5.5m long. Klaus requires 650cm wide parking aisles for
         comfortability, although AS2890.1:2004 only requires 580cm. This is considered sufficient given the
         turn paths provided in Appendix B where the geometrical combination of parking aisle angle and
         parking bay dimensions provide for sufficient turn paths for user class 1A where up to 3-point turn for
         B85 vehicles are appropriate.


ITE considers the proposed car stackers sufficient to provide for effective parking management and supply and
consider the proposed arrangements to be safe and convenient, with majority of drivers being familiar with
such arrangements at other similar developments. Specification of the system is provided in Annexure C.



4.2         Servicing Requirements
4.2.1       Regular Servicing (Refuse)
It is the intention of the proposed development to provide kerbside collection via Elanda Street. This is
considered to be the most suitable, efficient and safe method for refuse collection due to the topography and
size of the site. If kerbside collection using 240L bins is to occur on-street, which is consistent with the
surrounding area (for existing multiple unit dwellings), this will not generate additional vehicles on Elanda
Street and will ultimately reduce traffic impacts to both vehicles and pedestrians.


A summary of the estimated refuse generation along with detailed calculations of bin sizes, collection
frequency and storage capacity are shown in Table 5.3.

Table 5.3        Waste Generation

                                         Multiple Dwelling Type 4 Conventional Waste Generation
                  Type                                 Units                    Waste                    Recycling
               3-bedroom                                 5
                                                                                  1:2                      1:2
               2-bedroom                                 1
                  Total                                  6                         3                        3


                 Refuse Collection Room Size (m2)                                                 2.6



                                                                  17
Log in to download the original file

Traffic Impact Statement.pdf · 8.2 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.