Original source · versioned page text
Stormwater Management Plan
Attached to the e-mail MCU16/0066 & OPW16/0133 - Engineering report & Stormwater Mgmt Plan (2 of 4).
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
Client: Hass Holdings ATF The Quasar Trust Location: Taylor Court, Cooroy
Variable Value Units
Area: 0.924 ha
Tc 5.9 minutes
C10 0.68 fraction
Table 8 - Rational Method Calculations
Variable 1% AEP 10% AEP 39% AEP
Freq Factor 1.2 1.0 0.85
Intensity (mm/hr) 299.5 205.2 149.1
Discharge (m3/s) 0.628 0.358 0.221
The Rational Method Calculations for the 1%, 10% and 39% AEP events generally reflect results
from the XP-RAFTS model. Thus, the XP-RAFTS peak flows have been adopted for hydrological
modelling and detention sizing purposes. A comparison of the results is provided in Table 9.
Table 9 - XP-RAFTS and Rational Method Comparison
Rational XP-RAFTS Difference
AEP (m3/s) (m3/s) (%)
1% 0.628 0.630 0.4
10% 0.358 0.357 -0.4
39% 0.221 0.219 -1.1
6.5 Design Discharges Unmitigated
6.5.1 Peak Durations
Temporal patterns from Australian Rainfall and Runoff, Volume 2, (1987) have been adopted for
each storm duration. A range of storm durations were analysed to determine the peak discharge
for the catchment. Table 10 presents the flows generated using XP-RAFTS from design storms at
the proposed development site for the existing and developed (unmitigated) case scenarios.
Table 10 - XP-RAFTS Design Discharges (Unmitigated)
Existing Developed
Peak Peak
Critical Critical
Catchment AEP Flow Flow
Duration Duration
(m3/s) (m3/s)
1% 25 min 0.630 15 min 0.724
Outlet 10% 60 min 0.357 25 min 0.518
39% 60 min 0.219 25 min 0.331
The peak flows discharging from the site have increased in the developed case scenario due to the
resulting increase in impervious area. To reduce the flows to meet non-worsening conditions, a
detention tank is proposed to increase detention capacity on site and reduce the offsite flows.
6.6 Stormwater Detention
The pre-developed and post-developed (mitigated) conditions were modelled in XP-RAFTS to
demonstrate that stormwater flows will not be increased with the inclusion of an appropriately
designed storage device. The increases in peak flows have been mitigated on site through the use
of a detention tank. Detention provided by the bioretention basin to treat water quality will also be
utilised on site.
Covey Associates Pty Ltd 9 Project No: 161968
Consulting Engineers 100415 Rpt Iss A
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLarge file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.