Council archive · source document
Copy Response to DERM's information request from applicant - REC11/0145
Very large file (31.3 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
. l
(
BRSS6220.000 2 5 March 2012
Applicant Response
Please refer to plan no.BRSS6220.000-001 REV A and D prepared by LandPartners Limited in
Appendix A. This plan outlines the Real Property boundaries showing surrounding allotments,
roads, the esplanade and existing buildings on site. We also note, plan no.BRSS6220.000-002
REV A shows the adjoining properties containing building seaward to the Coastal Building Line.
2. One copy of a plan or plans at a scale not smaller than 7:7000 showing the existing (and
proposed finished) levels of the land to be subdivided and that area of land between the
land to be subdivided and the line of mean high water spring tides. The levels are to be
taken at the points of intersedion of a 25 metre grid related to the Real Properly
boundaries and to be in metres related to Australian Height Datum. The plan or plans to
be certified by a licensed surveyor with the date ofsurvey shown.
Applicant Response
Please refer to plan no.BRSS6220.000-001 REV D, prepared by LandPartners Limited in Appendix
A. We note that the line of Mean High Water Spring (MHWS)tide is located over 75m away from
the site and is separated from the site by Lot 159 on CP839188 and the Esplanade.
3. The location of the proposed development in relation to the boundary of the coastal
management distrid.
Applicant Response
Please refer to plan no.BRSS6220.000-001 REV D and plan no.BRSS6220.000-002 REV A,
prepared by LandPartners Limited in Appendix A. The boundary of Coastal Management Control
District No.8 has been taken from the Beach Protection Authority Plan SC 3339A. We note that
there is sufficient building area landward of the Coastal Management Control District No.8. The
building area is of a similar size to the existing building area on the nearby Lot 594 on RP48112.
We also note, there are existing buildings and structures seaward of the Coastal building Line and
we anticipatefurther development of the new lots will be able to keep to the Building Line
approved.
4. The location of the storm tide natural hazard management area adopted by local
government or if local government have not adopted a storm tide natural hazard
management area, the plan should I’llustrate an alternative area subj’ed to storm tide
inundation.
Applicant Response
Please refer to plan no.BRSS6220.000-001 REV D, prepared by LandPartners Limited in Appendix
A. The plan indicates the default storm tide inundation area as being HAT + 1.5m in elevation
(being RL2.66 AHD). We note that the site at its lowest point is approximately RL 15 and that the
building areas range in elevation from RL 15 upwards to RL 18. Additionally Webb Road, being the
\
\
access to the site is approximately RL20. The site is not within the default storm tide inundqtion ~.
\ \
\
\
\
(refer to Appendix C f~x _relevant search results), and therefore no further ~<
conSidera~ior JO~ ~\{/~
ar_ra
oostOI Pion P"’icy 2.2.4
C~o,stol H\~rds is, lequ~ed in relotion to Outcome
_1. .~. /)/ \) ~~ \,
-
Illtre,
I
0\
~
~,-,:,,~,-
"
~\y’
\\’’\
~:\,’\.
.
".,,~-\::..~~~ :\\_\\".:_,,,"
,
’.’ ,.,,",,"
\\"",\", ’" ’,,,,,,
’
’- ,
’,,’
,,;’\’
~
,
’~~~\’
~’-:\’\\\~\~(,
\\\
\ t
"
",)
’:’
! -’
\
~
~
\
/
~ ,-\ =\\.,\ (~~~-:-~..:/
,~_:...::.
_
’-
<?
_
~
--
~
_’--::
’:.. _
,
-~
.:
-’~
~,-
~
-.;-.
_::
,’\.
,,,[ ~
-
:-,......
-
"
,\\.r
<
1 ~ )t
~
,
’"
...
-
\
(. )\’
IRe’._,
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Copy Response to DERM's information request from applicant - REC11/0145Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 31.3 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.