Original source · versioned page text
ADAMS + SPARKES Town Planning Report (30 & 32 The Cockleshell)
Attached to the e-mail MCU17/0563, OPW17/0597 & RAL17/0513 - Material Change of Use, Op Works & Recon (access easement) - 30 & 32 The Cockleshell, Noosaville.
Original PDF page 15, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE AND OPERATIONAL WORKS TO ESTABLISH MULTIPLE HOUSING (2X TYPE 2 DUPLEXES)
AND RECONFIGURATION OF A LOT (ACCESS EASEMENT) 14
30 & 32 THE COCKLESHELL NOOSAVILLE
Residential Uses Code;
Reconfiguring a Lot Code;
Landscaping Code;
Driveways and Carparking Code;
Transport, Roads and Drainage Code;
Erosion and Sediment Control Code;
Existing Services Code;
Earthworks Code;
Waste Management Code;
Water Sensitive Design Code; and,
Natural Hazards Overlay Code.
46. The proposed development generally complies with the Acceptable Measures and Performance Criteria
of all applicable codes. The pertinent issues identified throughout the assessment of the application are
detailed below.
47. Where the below sections are silent in relation to an assessable element, the development is seen to
comply with that relevant assessment criteria and no further assessment is required.
5.3 Overlay Codes
48. Table 5 below provides an assessment against all relevant Overlay Codes. The Noosa Plan 2006 includes a
number of Overlays, which recognise features and constraints within the area. The Overlays, which impact
upon this development are detailed below:
Table 5 Assessment Against Overlay Codes
Relevant Overlay Comments
Flood Hazard Overlay
The proposed development complies with
Table 13.10 of the Natural Hazards Overlay
Code, which relates to Flood Hazard Areas.
The proposed development contains a pad level
of 2.4 metre AHD, with a Finished Floor Levels
of 2.7 metres AHD.
The levels of the development satisfy the flood
immunity requirements specified within the
Flood Information Certificates (Appendix 7).
In order to satisfy the flood immunity
requirements, the subject sites are required to
be filled, with a total of 370m3 of fill required.
360 Civil Consulting Pty Ltd have confirmed that
the development will likely impact upon the
flood storage capacity of the area. However, it
has been confirmed that there is no alternative,
which will achieve flood immunity
requirements without impacting upon flood
storage.
MOHAMMED HUSSAIN, LUCY RANDALL, SUZANNE MAREE JOHNSON COLE AND DR DAVID
ANDREW JOHNSON
DECEMBER 2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.