Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Council archive · source document

Planning Report · OPW22/0140

of 16

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

               Total = 5)
 Earthworks    Cut or fill less than 1.5m           Max 3.5m cut for basement                       Y
                                                    However, this is for the basement and when
                                                    fully constructed a maximum of 1.5m of cut is
                                                    proposed to the north side of the building.
 Waste         Screened waste areas and             Bin storage will not be seen from the street    Y
 Storage       located for transport to kerb with   frontages
               grade of <1:15
 Roof Form     No     rooftop    terraces    and    Rooftop terraces                                PO
               parapets do not exceed 50% of
               the front facade
 Fencing       Setback an avg of 1m and             No fencing proposed. Retaining wall and         Can      be
               articulated by stepping the          entrance provided along frontage.               conditioned
               design.                                                                              to comply.



As demonstrated in the above Table, the proposal generally complies with the key development
parameters with Performance Outcome assessment for setbacks, landscaping, and car parking.
Setbacks are addressed in section 4.3, landscaping and car parking in Section 4.5 of this report.


4.2 Setbacks
The applicant undertook a pre-lodgement meeting where Council acknowledged the constrained
nature of the lot and indicated the existing setbacks were acceptable to the new building providing
wall heights (and volumetrically) are generally consistent to the existing development.

Frontage

The design retains a 6m setback to Berrima Row (with a small encroachment for the eaves). The
application seeks a reduced secondary road setback to Bottlebrush Ave (4.5m and 4.3m to the
eaves). This setback is consistent with the existing building on the site (as denoted in red on the
proposed plans).




                                                                                                    Page 10 of 16

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.0 MB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Planning Report.pdf · 2.0 MB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.