Council archive · source document
Planning Report · OPW22/0140
Total = 5)
Earthworks Cut or fill less than 1.5m Max 3.5m cut for basement Y
However, this is for the basement and when
fully constructed a maximum of 1.5m of cut is
proposed to the north side of the building.
Waste Screened waste areas and Bin storage will not be seen from the street Y
Storage located for transport to kerb with frontages
grade of <1:15
Roof Form No rooftop terraces and Rooftop terraces PO
parapets do not exceed 50% of
the front facade
Fencing Setback an avg of 1m and No fencing proposed. Retaining wall and Can be
articulated by stepping the entrance provided along frontage. conditioned
design. to comply.
As demonstrated in the above Table, the proposal generally complies with the key development
parameters with Performance Outcome assessment for setbacks, landscaping, and car parking.
Setbacks are addressed in section 4.3, landscaping and car parking in Section 4.5 of this report.
4.2 Setbacks
The applicant undertook a pre-lodgement meeting where Council acknowledged the constrained
nature of the lot and indicated the existing setbacks were acceptable to the new building providing
wall heights (and volumetrically) are generally consistent to the existing development.
Frontage
The design retains a 6m setback to Berrima Row (with a small encroachment for the eaves). The
application seeks a reduced secondary road setback to Bottlebrush Ave (4.5m and 4.3m to the
eaves). This setback is consistent with the existing building on the site (as denoted in red on the
proposed plans).
Page 10 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Planning Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
Planning Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.0 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.