Original source · versioned page text
Code Assessment - 12 Eenie Creek Rd (RESOLVED DRAFT)
exiting utility infrastructure,
maintenance of existing infrastructure. No
existing landscaping and
service relocation is proposed.
vegetation.
PO5 AO5
Complies with PO
Vehicular access does not adversely Vehicular access avoids disturbance
No existing landscaping or native
impact on the health and integrity to the tree protection zone of trees
vegetation is affected by vehicular access.
of existing landscaping or native on public land. Acceptable
The existing frontage garden to be
vegetation, where possible. Parking Outcomes Acceptable Outcomes
removed is not native vegetation and is
and manoeuvring Table 9.4.1.3
replaced with a garden bed and screen
Criteria for assessment (part)
hedging of greater amenity value.
Performance outcomes Assessable
development Parking and
manoeuvring Performance
outcomes
PO6 AO6.1, AO6.2, AO6.3, AO6.4
Complies with PO
Sufficient parking (a) is provided The number of car parking spaces,
The acceptable outcome calls for parking
having regard to the specifics of the motor cycle spaces, bicycle spaces
in accordance with Table 9.4.1.4. Assessed
use including— (i) the type and and loading bays is not less than the
as an absolute number, the table would
intensity of land use; (ii) any minimum number specified in Table
require 12 spaces for a 600 m2 showroom,
existing parking available on the 9.4.1.4 Minimum parking
and the site provides two. The proposal is
site; (iii) hours of operation; (iv) requirements including end of trip
therefore assessed against the
likely numbers of users; (v) facilities. Editor's note— with regard
performance outcome, which asks
accessibility to the site by means to the provision of end of trip
whether sufficient parking is provided
other than private (vi) the peak facilities, where there is a conflict
having regard to the specifics of the use.
parking demand periods of uses on with the QDC MP 4.1 for major
the site; and (vii) the availability of developments the QDC applies. For
The material point is that the change of
alternative car parking; and (a) (b) all other development Table 9.4.1.4
use generates no meaningful additional
is provided to accommodate the applies.
demand. Table 9.4.1.4 applies one space
number and type of (b) vehicles and AO6.2 Where appropriate,
per 50 m2 to a Showroom. It applies the
motorcycles likely to be generated motorcycle spaces can be provided
same rate to Low Impact Industry,
by the development. (c) (a) (b) on site in lieu of required car
Medium Impact Industry and Warehouse
parking spaces, excluding industry
uses up to 500 m2, and one space per 100
activities, at the following rates: 2
m2 above that. The lawful use of the site
motorcycle spaces
is industry and bulk storage under TPC
990. On the same gross floor area the two
rates produce: at 440 m2, nine spaces for
the lawful use and nine for the
showroom, an increase of nil; at 600 m2,
eleven spaces for the lawful use and
twelve for the showroom, an increase of
one space. The numerical shortfall against
the table is therefore a pre-existing
characteristic of this 809 m2 lot and its
existing building, and is not created by
this proposal.
Demand in practice is lower again. The
showroom operates by appointment only,
so customer attendance is pre-arranged,
dispersed and intermittent rather than
continuous, and display vehicles are
accommodated within the building rather
than occupying customer parking. The
applicant offers the appointment only
limitation as a condition of any approval.
A parking schedule confirming the
number of spaces existing and proposed is
to accompany the application, together
with confirmation that existing on-site
parking is not reduced by the works. A
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.