Council archive · source document
Town Planning Report - Adams & Sparkes · RAL26/0023
5.2 Cooroy Local Plan Code
18. The site is within the Cooroy local plan area and located in the rural hinterland outside the Cooroy urban
boundary. The proposal does not extend urban development beyond that boundary, creates no
additional lots and leaves the total land area unchanged, consistent with overall outcome (2)(b) of the
Cooroy Local Plan Code.
19. The balance of the code addresses built form, streetscape, centre activities and housing within the
township and has limited application to a rural boundary realignment. No buildings, works or vegetation
clearing are proposed. Character and riparian vegetation and key views to Mt Cooroy and the Black
Mountain Range are unaffected by the proposal (PO5, PO6), and no ecological linkage or open space
corridor is fragmented (PO21, PO22). Existing effluent disposal areas are retained within the lot they serve
and no new access points to watercourses are created, so water quality in the Lake Macdonald catchment
is unaffected (PO23, PO24)
5.3 Rural Zone Code
20. Overall outcomes (2)(c) and (2)(g) of the Rural Zone Code seek to conserve rural land, avoid fragmentation
and limit reconfigurations to those protecting remnant vegetation or riparian corridors. As indicated
above, the realignment creates no additional lots and does not change the total land area. The new
boundary sits clear of the mapped waterway and riparian buffer.
21. Lot 2 is mapped within the Agricultural Land Conservation Area. The realignment does not reduce its
already limited productive capacity (PO1, PO2), and as the dwelling houses are existing, no separation
distances apply (AO2.4, AO8.5). Each lot retains a single dwelling house (PO3). No buildings or works are
proposed, so building height and scale (PO7), natural values and overland flow (PO11, PO12) and scenic
amenity (PO13, PO15) are unaffected. Existing buildings stay within the lot they serve and continue to
meet the 10 metre setbacks in AO8.4. Both lots retain safe direct access to Musa Vale Road (AO10).
5.4 Reconfiguring a Lot Code
22. Table 9.5.1.3 of the Reconfiguring a Lot Code specifies a minimum lot size of 100ha in the Rural zone.
Both lots are already well below this. No additional lots are created, the total land area is unchanged, and
no additional dwellings can be established. The realignment satisfies A026(b), as the reconfigured lots are
of a more regular shape. Proposed Lot 2 reduces from 4.877ha to 4.011ha but remains a large rural lot
with an existing dwelling, keeping its frontage and access to Musa Vale Road and ample area for on-site
servicing and rural use. The realignment delivers a better planning outcome than the current
arrangement.
5.5 Overlay Codes
23. The site is identified as being affected by MSES Regulated Vegetation – intersecting a watercourse, and
by a Riparian Buffer Area. The proposed boundary realignment does not involve any operational works,
earthworks or vegetation clearing and will not interfere with the environmental values of the site.
Furthermore, the proposed boundary does not intersect the mapped waterway or its riparian buffer.
24. The site is identified within the Landslide Hazard Overlay due to the undulating topography of the area,
with both moderate and high hazard areas mapped over the site. No operational works or earthworks
are proposed as part of this application, no new building envelopes are created, and as such no further
assessment is required.
ASTP REF: 260720 PAGE 9 OF 11
Document Set ID: 25106968
Version: 1, Version Date: 28/08/2026
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Town Planning Report - Adams & Sparkes.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 842 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.