Original source · versioned page text
6.5.22 - Further advice response 6 may
C. Update the fill level for the building envelope of proposed Lot 8 to the PMF
Level.
Lot 8 to include a 1,100m2 fill envelope (adjacent to the existing house) above the PMF.
The Flood Investigation modelling has been remodelled to accommodate the changes in
the subdivision design and all lot envelopes are above the PMF, while also having no
impact to adjoining properties.
D. Provide a Risk Assessment Report that demonstrates compliance with PO7
and AO7.1 to AO7.3 of the Flood Hazard Overlay Code and addresses
management of risks to occupants of the site having regard to Mckinnon
Drive being not trafficable during a PMF event.
E. Amend Table 4-5 of the Flood Investigation – 60 Glenridge Dve, Cooroibah
Version 4 prepared by PeakUrban dated 01/04/2022 to address the
following:
i. The minimum fill level for proposed Lot 8 is to be amended to the
PMF level. All works are to be carried out generally in accordance
with the updated flood investigation report.
ii. The updated flood investigation report is to be submitted to Council
for approval prior to the issue of Development Permit.
Brendon Bolt from Peak Urban Consulting Hydraulic Engineers provides an updated
section in the Flood Investigation Report (4.3.2.8) discussing the Flood Risk from the site.
The relevant section of the report is included below (highlight’s emphasis) as well as the
GCCC Flood Refuge Guideline:
4.3.2.8.Flood Risk
This development has been designed to provide flood free access to all lots via the new internal road
in events up to the 10% AEP and will remain trafficable in events up to the 1% AEP event in
accordance with the Queensland Urban Drainage Manual (QUDM). Further consideration of flood
risk has been undertaken in events greater than the 1% AEP event, with assessment of the PMF
event taking place. The assessment found that the lots within the development would become
isolated in extreme events such as the PMF, with the internal access road having flow conditions that
would not be trafficable.
An assessment was completed as to the length of time the internal access would be considered not
trafficable (flow depths> 0.2m) along the warning time between the start of the rain event to when
the internal crossing becomes not trafficable. The assessment was completed for the PMF event for
a number of durations and is highlighted below. From this, it is considered that a site flood warning
system would not be appropriate in this situation due to the short response times for flood waters to
rise. It would be safer outcome for residents to seek refuge within their houses and communication
about a extreme weather system come from Council or State Disaster Management Services.
This assessment highlights that there would be a limited amount of time to warn / evacuate residents
due to the relatively short amount of time it takes for the internal road to become inundated in an
extreme (i.e PMF) event. This would be typical of all catchments where the upstream catchment is
relatively small. From this, the time of submergence is also relatively small with times ranging from
2.0 to 8.0 hours depending on the event duration. From this, it is considered that the provision of
suitable flood refuge or evacuation to higher ground (i.e.to Glenridge Drive) would be the preferred
risk management measure as opposed to evacuating the area to a formal evacuation centre. Each
lot is provided with an1,100m2 building envelope above the PMF level that would be suitable to act
as a flood refuge until flood waters recede. The application of a flood refuge is recommended in
similar circumstances as means to address flood risk and potential burden by Gold Coast City Council
(GCCC), who have large amount of flood plain on which developments are managed. The Guideline
developed by GCCC is presented in Appendix J, and in summary states “a shelter-in-place
approach” provides an opportunity to address the risks of isolation and subsequent risk to life and
potential burden to emergency services and has been commonly used in development assessment
for larger developments”. Further to this, that subsequent that Council Disaster Management Plan
includes communications to these future residents that their building envelopes serve as a flood
refuge should anevent greater than the 1% AEP event occur. This information could also be
conveyed via property note.
Page 2 of 5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.