Original source · versioned page text
Geotech Report - Initial Findings
Attached to the e-mail Operation Works Application - OPW19/0266 - 215 David Low Way, Peregian Beach - (EMAIL 2/3) - Site Based Stormwater Management Plan, Acid Sulphate Soil & Groundwater Management Plan.
Essence of Peregian
215-219 David Low Way, Peregian Beach
Project No. 007-160A,
27 April 2010
5.3.4 Compaction
Exposed subgrade should be uniformly compacted (if possible) to the minimum dry density ratio nominated
in Table 4. If the subgrade is too soft to allow compaction, a granular bridging layer (e.g. crushed concrete)
and acceptance by engineering inspection under proof-rolling would be required for the bridging layer. Any
‘soft spots’ encountered should be either tyned and dried then recompacted, or excavated and replaced with
compacted granular select fill. In areas of soft/firm clays, or where subgrade level is close to these clays, it
will not be possible to obtain proper compaction and allowance is suggested for over excavation and
replacement with a track rolled granular replacement.
Table 4: Subgrade and Fill Compaction Requirements
Location Minimum Dry Density Ratio
Foundation support 100% (Standard compaction)*
General floor slab support 100% (Standard compaction)*
Pavement Subgrade - >500mm below subgrade level 98% (Standard compaction)
- top 500mm of subgrade 100% (Standard compaction)
* ‘Level 1’ supervision
All fill which is to support building loads and/or movement sensitive features of the development, should be
‘controlled’ (i.e. placed in layers having a loose thickness of not more than 250mm and uniformly compacted
to an appropriate engineering specification). Suggested minimum compaction requirements for fill are given
in Table 4.
Reactive materials are not recommended for use as fill. However, if it is not possible to avoid the use of
reactive material it should be placed and maintained at a moisture content greater than Standard optimum
moisture content, in order to reduce potential shrink-swell movements. It should be noted that over-
compacting reactive fill (particularly at a moisture content below optimum) should be avoided as potentially
significant expansion could occur on ‘wetting up’. Reactive fill/soil moisture should not be allowed to change
during or following construction.
To assist with achieving adequate control over fill placement, geotechnical testing as set out in Section 8 of
AS3798 - 2007 Guidelines on earthworks for commercial and residential developments would be required. It
is recommended that where fill is to be placed beneath pavements, that ‘Level 2’ geotechnical supervision
and testing be adopted and the requirement be increased to ‘Level 1’ where fill is to be placed beneath
buildings or anywhere where future settlement needs to be limited.
5.3.5 Traffickability
To assist with traffickability, consideration should be given to the placement of a coarse granular working
surface over the exposed subgrade. The required layer thickness will depend on the type of plant proposed
to traffic the site and should be determined on a case by case basis however, a layer thickness of
approximately 0.15m would be anticipated for ‘light’ equipment.
5.4 Groundwater Control
5.4.1 Temporary
It will be necessary to obtain groundwater samples for testing to confirm disposal water quality, prior to
finalisation of groundwater control methods.
butlerpartners.com.au Page 10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.