This timeline uses NoosaWatch’s attributed transcript times on its own subtitled recording. It does not assign speech to agenda items. Drag across the timeline to choose a window, or use the start/end controls. Select a speech block to watch that actual segment. Chairing and procedural speech are included; airtime is not a measure of impact.
Timeline axis: hours:minutes on the local recording. Transcript version a4f800d4bfc56dcc · the chart and record list below use the same selected time window. Segment text is supplied in full for context, even when only part of its duration contributes.
Filter and investigate these records
Named speaking time by Person
Named speaking time
Speaking time for each named speaker in the selected meetings, with overlapping passages counted once. Topic and item filters select whole meetings; these times do not measure an individual item’s discussion. Select a bar to inspect its records. Seconds use the selected local window where set, and include speech unallocated to agenda items.
Good morning everyone and welcome to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting today 10th of March. I declare the meeting open. I'd like to begin by an Acknowledgement to Country. Noosa Council proudly acknowledges and respects Australia
Morning, Councillors. Today's report is to seek Council endorsement to work with the State department of planning to undertake a section 18 process under the Planning Act 2016 for a proposed Noosa Plan 2020 regarding land at 94 and 170 Holt
Will entail so so the consultation process will still undergo the statutory requirement of 20 business of a minimum of 20 business working days. So we will still be required to do that. And it will be our normal process that we would do in
In terms of standard Planning Scheme amendments, how does the section 18 process work? In comparison, so which the process faster, more efficient? Yes. But in terms back to the community engagement, is it less time for community engagement
Basically, infrastructure processes through Planning Scheme amendments is dealt with under the local government infrastructure plan. We'll do consultation with the relevant State for surrounding infrastructure, but from the, I guess, prelim
Infrastructure charges. Will be liable for the development, which will contribute to any trunk infrastructure, and through our current LGIP process we're identifying any upgrades required to road networks. In of terms trunk, also the State
That would be part of the State interest review process and yeah, that would be required to connect into the existing Unitywater infrastructure. It's an industrial been included in the urban footprint, so it's expected that those services w