Original source · versioned page text
Meeting papers
The original of this document is very large (166 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Original PDF page 22, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING 8 JULY 2025
Finance Risks Mitigation
The program is based on scope rather than a set budget.
If the scope is adjusted and accepted by Queensland
Reconstruction Authority, then the program value is
adjusted. This will include the supporting services such a
project management.
The program cost is structured that LGA’s submit their
Program costs exceeding Queensland estimated scope of work and estimated value.
Reconstruction Authority values Queensland Reconstruction Authority assess this and
allocated by Queensland Reconstruction provide agreement. They then provide 30% of these
Authority costs upfront for LGA’s to manage cash flow. Thereafter,
the payments are made based on monthly reports
recovering actual costs. The final 10% of value is held for
final acquittal and payment on full approval. To date,
NorthLane managed submissions from the 2022 program
have not had any costs unexpectedly rejected by
Queensland Reconstruction Authority.
Contract KPI will include a target of 100% of costs must
Unrecoverable costs are encountered be within the Disaster Reconstruction Funding
Arrangement guidelines and cost fully recoverable
Scope & Quality Risk Mitigation
The track record from the 2022 program along with the
lessons learnt ensure confidence that Northlane have
clarity of expectations.
The workmanship will be monitored with regular Council
Northlane does not construct the scope
surveillance. The Council addition of a Quality Manager
of work to the minimum standard.
Resource has had a positive impact on the matching
quality outcomes.
Council has nominated a Council rep as Superintendent
who delegates works to Northlane RPEQ.
Safety Risks Mitigation
The Work Safe definition nominates the contractor or
person conducting a business or undertaking as having
the primary duty of care to ensure, so far as reasonably
practicable, the health and safety of workers. Whilst not
accountable for the safety on site, like all stakeholders,
Northlane do not meet safety standards they are responsible for their own safe behaviour and
or conduct work safely reporting unsafe behaviours recognised on site.
Council WHS reps will part of the cross functional internal
team engaged to support Northlane.
The lead contractor has ultimate responsibility of the site
as part of the construction scope.
Northlane do not meet environmental
standards Preliminary works include the use of outsourced
specialist environmental consultant to assist in ensuring
Council meet necessary environmental conditions.
Page 22 of 610
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.