This timeline uses NoosaWatch’s attributed transcript times on its own subtitled recording. It does not assign speech to agenda items. Drag across the timeline to choose a window, or use the start/end controls. Select a speech block to watch that actual segment. Chairing and procedural speech are included; airtime is not a measure of impact.
Timeline axis: hours:minutes on the local recording. Transcript version 5625006b49314b09 · the chart and record list below use the same selected time window. Segment text is supplied in full for context, even when only part of its duration contributes.
Filter and investigate these records
Named speaking time by Person
Named speaking time
Speaking time for each named speaker in the selected meetings, with overlapping passages counted once. Topic and item filters select whole meetings; these times do not measure an individual item’s discussion. Select a bar to inspect its records. Seconds use the selected local window where set, and include speech unallocated to agenda items.
May 2023. Declare the meeting open. Begin by acknowledging the Traditional Custodians of the land which were gathered today. That's the Kabi Kabi people and pay respect to their elders past, present and emerging. We have everyone in attenda
As mentioned earlier, we're here today to award a contract for the Lawnville Road Bridge replacement. It's a contract CN00236. It's a lump sum contract that includes all materials and all services required for the construction of the bridge
Yeah. Yeah, thanks. Craig, I noticed that, Jasper, I noticed that they put in two tender prices, one at 1.5 mil and one at 1.45 mil. We've gone from 1.45 mil. Can you just give us a bit of an idea on the difference? Between the two prices a
I'll give a really high-level, broad overview, and if I get it wrong, I'll allow Jasper to correct me. But my understanding is that we had two spans, which would be a headstock, a series of piles, and then a headstock. The alternate tender,
Thank you, I sort of got that from that, but I just wanted to clarify if that was the reason behind, so it is a single span bridge as opposed to a dual span bridge with no central pylon. Thank you.
Here's a question, this is the one down the bottom, it's got reasonably constrained sort of road dynamics around, is there any work being done to lead into the bridges as part of this or is that something we're looking at doing at the same
Again, I'll give a high level explanation and then Jasper will correct me if I get this wrong. I think we're constrained with the bridge grant requirements, so the purpose of the bridge funding is to renew bridges to allow or improve freigh
Making them tie in new bridge design levels so they'll be pavement rehabilitation and just adjusting the approach grades to match into the new bridge but that's how we're limited by the bridge funding program and we can't be doing full-scal